Re: Release Verification Checklist

2013-12-01 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:33 PM, sebb wrote: > Not sure I understand why the checklist needs to be specific. The checklist should include only items which might block the release of the artifacts under review. Expanding it to include unrelated concerns imposes an unnecessary cost each time someo

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.2.0-incubating RC0

2013-12-01 Thread Hitesh Shah
Hello all, Closing the vote since 72 hours have passed. With the required 3 IPMC votes and no -1s, this vote passes. +1s (binding - IPMC ) Alan Gates Olivier Lamy Arun C Murthy +1s (non-binding) Hitesh Shah Lianhui Wang Mike Liddell Cheolsoo Park Siddharth Seth Mark Wagner Tsuyoshi Ozawa Gunt

Re: [PROPOSAL] Experiment: VXQuery PPMC Release Voting

2013-12-01 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi, Apologies for returning to this after one week, but I have been on vacation. I am not against this experiment in general, especially after Bertrand's later clarification. I am against the experiment in VXQuery's case because Till has already been made an IPMC member under the prior experim

Re: Release vote thresholds

2013-12-01 Thread Dave Fisher
On Nov 27, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> I am not sure that this is a step in the correct direction. >> >> Dave, I'm sure you realize that your opposition is d

Re: Release Verification Checklist

2013-12-01 Thread Dave Fisher
Marvin, I applaud your efforts here. If we are going to take PPMC release votes as binding then we should be sure that these are up to standards. Even if we don't this is still very valuable. One note I have is I don't think we should be teaching that some of release steps are "optional" when

Re: Release Verification Checklist

2013-12-01 Thread sebb
On 1 December 2013 19:09, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:33 PM, sebb wrote: >> Not sure I understand why the checklist needs to be specific. > > The checklist should include only items which might block the release of the > artifacts under review. Expanding it to include unre

Re: Release Verification Checklist

2013-12-01 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > One note I have is I don't think we should be teaching that some of release > steps are "optional" when they are required. Don't get me wrong -- I would actually prefer to make each PPMC member do the work for each item. The main rationale beh

[VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.1-incubating

2013-12-01 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I'd like to release Apache Sirona 0.1-incubating. Release notes: http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/releases/release-notes-0.1-incubating.html Vote result from dev@sirona: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sirona-dev/201312.mbox/browser Maven staged release repository: htt

Re: Release Verification Checklist

2013-12-01 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:46 PM, sebb wrote: >> Can you live with this second draft? > > I don't understand what this means: > > ASF copyright correct in each top-level NOTICE. > > Why is it necessary in addition to the following? > > Top-level LICENSE and NOTICE correct for each distribution.

Re: Release Verification Checklist

2013-12-01 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/1/13 4:47 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: >On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> One note I have is I don't think we should be teaching that some of >>release >> steps are "optional" when they are required. > >Don't get me wrong -- I would actually prefer to make each PPMC m

Re: Release Verification Checklist

2013-12-01 Thread Dave Fisher
On Dec 1, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> One note I have is I don't think we should be teaching that some of release >> steps are "optional" when they are required. > > Don't get me wrong -- I would actually prefer to make each P