Clutch data - could ReportingSchedule data be merged into podlings.xml ?

2012-06-08 Thread sebb
As the subject says: is there any need for a separate ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml? The CMS bookmark allows direct edit via the copy at http://incubator.apache.org/podlings.xml So is the Wiki page still necessary? Thoughts? ---

Re: Clutch data - could ReportingSchedule data be merged into podlings.xml ?

2012-06-08 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:12 PM, sebb wrote: > As the subject says: is there any need for a separate > ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml? Not really AFAICT. +1 to merging them, though note that the reminder script needs to be updated too. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [DISCUSS] graduation of VCL as a TLP

2012-06-08 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: > The VCL project would like to graduate.  We think we have fulfilled all of the > requirements for graduation. Sounds great! I remember from your May report that you were getting close to graduation. > There is one member listed in the i

Re: June reports in two weeks

2012-06-08 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > There's plenty of time still before the June reports [1] start flowing in. Not anymore. :-) We're still waiting for reports from the following podlings (shepherd in parenthesis): * Bloodhound (Dave Fisher) * Cordova (Matt Hogstrom) * F

Re: June reports in two weeks

2012-06-08 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > * Cordova (Matt Hogstrom) I reminded the PPMC and asked them to submit a report latest by Monday. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incu

Re: [MENTORS] Third Party source

2012-06-08 Thread Kalle Korhonen
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I fear we are miscommunicating again. > Only the copyright owner is allowed to (re)move copyright notices > or permit others to (re)move them on the owner's behalf. Interesting, why is that? Is it so by the law? Kalle ---

Re: [MENTORS] Third Party source

2012-06-08 Thread Sam Ruby
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> I fear we are miscommunicating again. >> Only the copyright owner is allowed to (re)move copyright notices >> or permit others to (re)move them on the owner's behalf. > > Interesting

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

2012-06-08 Thread Arvind Prabhakar
With 72 hours passed, this VOTE is now closed. I will be sending the RESULT mail shortly. Thanks to all who voted and participated in the discussion. Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apach

Re: June reports in two weeks

2012-06-08 Thread Alan Gates
HCatalog will have their report in later today. Alan. On Jun 8, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: >> There's plenty of time still before the June reports [1] start flowing in. > > Not anymore. :-) We're still waiting for

[VOTE][RESULT] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

2012-06-08 Thread Arvind Prabhakar
The VOTE by Apache Incubator to graduate Flume podling has passed. Tally of votes is as follows: 16 +1 votes (9 binding, 7 non-binding) 0 +0 votes 0 -1 votes Binding +1 votes: Ralph Goers Tommaso Teofili Jukka Zitting Alan D. Cabrera Patrick Hunt Arvind Prabhakar Marvin Humphrey Jean-Baptise Onof

Re: June reports in two weeks

2012-06-08 Thread Brian LeRoux
Apologies from Cordova. We've updated http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2012 On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > HCatalog will have their report in later today. > > Alan. > > On Jun 8, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Jukka

Re: [MENTORS] Third Party source

2012-06-08 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/8/12 9:07 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Kalle Korhonen > wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>> I fear we are miscommunicating again. >>> Only the copyright owner is allowed to (re)move copyright notices >>> or permit others to (r

RE: [MENTORS] Third Party source

2012-06-08 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Along with the policy and trustworthiness matters that Sam provides, I can speculate some other reasons for concern about removing/replacing notices (of any kind) -- * Removal of a copyright notice can be taken as evidence of intentional infringement if not negligent infringement. * Removal

Re: [MENTORS] Third Party source

2012-06-08 Thread Sam Ruby
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > The individual involved is willing to > allow the copyright to be moved, and we asked here to find out how formal > the permission referred to in [1] must be. > > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html Would it be possible for the in

Re: [MENTORS] Third Party source

2012-06-08 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 8, 2012 2:33 PM, "Sam Ruby" wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > The individual involved is willing to > > allow the copyright to be moved, and we asked here to find out how formal > > the permission referred to in [1] must be. > > > > [1] http://www.apache.

Re: [MENTORS] Third Party source

2012-06-08 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/8/12 11:36 AM, "Greg Stein" wrote: > On Jun 8, 2012 2:33 PM, "Sam Ruby" wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >>> >>> The individual involved is willing to >>> allow the copyright to be moved, and we asked here to find out how > formal >>> the permission refer

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

2012-06-08 Thread Sam Ruby
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:40 PM, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> David Crossley wrote: >> > Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> >> >> I would love to see a resourceAlias attribute.  Or even a >> >> resourceAliases attribute (allowing multiple names, separated by a >> >> space and/or a comma). >> > >> > Y

Re: Clutch data - could ReportingSchedule data be merged into podlings.xml ?

2012-06-08 Thread David Crossley
Jukka Zitting wrote: > sebb wrote: > > As the subject says: is there any need for a separate > > ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml? > > Not really AFAICT. > > +1 to merging them, though note that the reminder script needs to be > updated too. Great idea. I have been wondering

Re: Clutch data - could ReportingSchedule data be merged into podlings.xml ?

2012-06-08 Thread David Crossley
sebb wrote: > As the subject says: is there any need for a separate > ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml? Some things to take care with, when we modify Clutch: Clutch based everything on the presence in ReportingSchedule and the name of the podling used there (lowercase, no spac

Re: Clutch data - could ReportingSchedule data be merged into podlings.xml ?

2012-06-08 Thread sebb
On 9 June 2012 02:38, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> As the subject says: is there any need for a separate >> ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml? > > Some things to take care with, when we modify Clutch: > > Clutch based everything on the presence in ReportingSchedule > a

Re: svn commit: r1348282 - in /incubator/public/trunk: clutch-graduating.txt content/clutchr1.ent content/clutchr2.ent content/clutcht.ent

2012-06-08 Thread sebb
On 9 June 2012 00:55, wrote: > Author: crossley > Date: Fri Jun  8 23:55:11 2012 > New Revision: 1348282 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348282&view=rev > Log: > flume started to graduate. > oozie updated status page. > oozie news about 2 new committers. > > Modified: >    incubator/pu

Re: svn commit: r1348282 - in /incubator/public/trunk: clutch-graduating.txt content/clutchr1.ent content/clutchr2.ent content/clutcht.ent

2012-06-08 Thread David Crossley
sebb wrote: > > Author: crossley > > Date: Fri Jun  8 23:55:11 2012 > > New Revision: 1348282 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348282&view=rev > > Log: > > flume started to graduate. > > oozie updated status page. > > oozie news about 2 new committers. > > > > Modified: > >    incubat