On 9 June 2012 02:38, David Crossley <cross...@apache.org> wrote: > sebb wrote: >> As the subject says: is there any need for a separate >> ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml? > > Some things to take care with, when we modify Clutch: > > Clutch based everything on the presence in ReportingSchedule > and the name of the podling used there (lowercase, no spaces).
Presence is roughly equal to status=current. Clutch currently uses the same transformation on the podling name atttribute. So this should not be much of a problem. > The main name in podlings.xml might be different, > so some assumptions in clutch might need adjustment. If a name attribute in podlings.xml is wrong, then it needs fixing. AFAIK, they all agree currently (IIRC clutch checks this). > Also the sequence of its data and hint-gathering process. Yes. > So a basic entry for a podling needs to be added to > the podlings.xml file soon after acceptance. Yes. > -David > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
