Hi,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> I started reading some of the Flume website and I think that when you go
> to the main Wiki page:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUME/Index
>
> When you click on the "Flume Cookbook" the resource is at cloudera.org.
>
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On May 24, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> >
> > There are four companies represented in this list: AVG Technologies,
> > Cloudera, CyberAgent and Trend Micro. Compared to other projects that
> have
> > successfully graduated fr
On May 25, 2012, at 2:46 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 24, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>>>
>>> There are four companies represented in this list: AVG Technologies,
>>> Cloudera, CyberAgent and Trend Micro. Co
I was involved with Flume prior to coming to Apache ... then a baby arrived
and things sort of changed for the last year. But you're right that I
haven't been around since then ... I still have a couple of source trees
around with various changes in them, but no idea what the status of any of
that
On 23 May 2012 19:35, Josh Wills wrote:
> Hey Jakob,
>
> This was a tough one-- you know that I've been talking about Crunch
> w/Joe Adler for a few weeks now, and I personally am really looking
> forward to working with you guys. That said, the team did feel
> strongly about keeping the initial
On 24 May 2012 07:44, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> To me that seems like it raises a barrier to entry -- but then,
> there are numerous projects around the ASF who are not hurting for
> contributors and who use JIRA for *everything* -- starting with Hadoop and
> Lucene.
>
>
I first encountered when
On 24 May 2012 06:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I've met other groups of people who like a JIRA centric view
> of the world. I suspect that if they did a bunch of other good things
> called out below, you or others would find the JIRA business
> digestible. Also, on the other hand, I fear that th
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Steve Loughran
wrote:
> On 24 May 2012 06:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> I've met other groups of people who like a JIRA centric view
>> of the world. I suspect that if they did a bunch of other good things
>> called out below, you or others would find the JIRA
On May 25, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Steve Loughran
> wrote:
>> On 24 May 2012 06:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> I've met other groups of people who like a JIRA centric view
>>> of the world. I suspect that if they did a bunch of other go
Hi Jukka,
Apologies for the delay, I had a vacation day. Replies inline.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CrunchProposal
>
> Some comments from the related vote thread:
>
>> for
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On May 25, 2012, at 2:46 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Ralph Goers <
> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On May 24, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> > The current PPMC consists o
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I don't claim that JIRA helps, but I also don't accept the proposition
> that JIRA hurts.
I claim it does both.
> I think that we should focus on the community, not the tools. The
> JIRA-oriented projects I follow have JIRA set to send a
> Assuming the VOTE passes, I hope you'll still give the project a chance,
> Jakob. Given your rep around the ASF, if you contribute as you have to other
> projects yet your merit goes unrecognized, I suspect that the Crunch's Mentors
> are going to be asking questions. ;)
I imagine we'll continu
On May 25, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On May 25, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Steve Loughran
>> wrote:
>>> On 24 May 2012 06:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
I've met other groups of people who like a JIRA centric view
>>
Hi Steve,
Thank you for your thoughtful comments. Replies inlined below.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Steve Loughran
wrote:
> On 23 May 2012 19:35, Josh Wills wrote:
>
>> Hey Jakob,
>>
>> This was a tough one-- you know that I've been talking about Crunch
>> w/Joe Adler for a few weeks now,
On May 25, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>>
>> That leaves just me as the only non-Cloudera PPMC member who actively
>> participates and I don't commit code and I've been on the PPMC primarily as
>> a mentor. If you somehow believe that this constitutes diversity than my
>> job as
Agreed about the Review tool... I've had similar problems when it's used in
Hadoop (however, thankfully, it's usage is fairly miniscule.)
Arun
On May 25, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On May 25, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Steve
Hi folks,
Just to throw my hat into the ring on this subject: I recognize that I have
been inactive from a contribution standpoint since Flume's introduction
into the ASF incubator, but still follow Flume on the mailing lists and in
other community meetups. I've done a bunch of work with Flume in
https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq
Nothing fancy: simple data gathering. Output will be validated and
placed into svn as input to another tool down the chain.
The topic I would like to discuss is what additional input validation
should be done. Mailing list names have specific formats. Wit
On 26 May 2012, at 03:54, Sam Ruby wrote:
> https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq
>
> Nothing fancy: simple data gathering. Output will be validated and
> placed into svn as input to another tool down the chain.
>
> The topic I would like to discuss is what additional input validation
> should
20 matches
Mail list logo
