Hi,
The Apache Stanbol PPMC is pleased to announce the first release of
Apache Stanbol versioned as 0.9.0-incubating.
Downloads are available at:
http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/downloads/releases.html
The Maven artifacts will shortly be available via Maven central.
Regards,
- The Apache S
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> sis-dev: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sis-dev/
> went from 9 email messages in January 2012 to 32, 74 and 39 in Feb-April 2012
Nice progress, sounds like the wake-up call early this year was a good thin
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Wink, and for the review, Dave!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> From activity it looks like this project should have graduated into a TLP a
> year
> ago. It looks like a mature and well developed project. I don't understand why
> they think that t
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the report, Wink, and for the review, Dave!
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> From activity it looks like this project should have graduated into a TLP a
>> year
>> ago. It looks like a mature and w
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Nuvem, and the review, Dave!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> It is really hard to know what this project is trying to do other than be a
> common
> API for Cloud Apps. Very low activity. Apparently no users. A little pick up
> in
> dev activity r
On 9 May 2012 07:42, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
>
>> On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>>
>>> Comments inline
>>>
>>> Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò
wrote:
>
> Hi Sebb,
> you
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. Something came up that took most of my attention
away from the Incubator for the last few days.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Well, the Wiki page explicitly says that the chair will assign.
If you have time, feel free to pick any of the repor
Le 5/9/12 6:35 PM, sebb a écrit :
On 9 May 2012 07:42, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharnywrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò
wrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find
On 9 May 2012, at 17:23, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the report, Wink, and for the review, Dave!
>>
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>> From activity it looks like this project should have graduate
On May 9, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the report, Wink, and for the review, Dave!
>>
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>> From activity it looks like this project should have grad
When adding users to podlings in asf-authorization-template, please
remember to update the incubator unix group as well, otherwise the
users can have problems with some parts of SVN or updating the site.
The following were added to podlings but not the incubator group:
bloodhound: hwright
giraph:
Hi,
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Blocked from graduation by IP signoff from University of
> Newcastle. Report asks for guidance. Why are mentors not providing
> this? The projet has, IMHO, been unnecessarily blocked by this since
> October 2010.
My earlier mentor cleanup
One of the Amber committers Pid (pidster) just restarted the discussion on the
Amber ML and he volunteered to contact the copyright owner. Hopefully the issue
will be resolved soon. But it seems that we are good to move forward.
Thanks,
Raymond
On May 9, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> Here is the command to fix this:
>
> modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=hwright,ssc
Done, thanks!
IIUC this only happens with existing Apache committers who join as
podling committers. New podling accounts are automatically added to
the incuba
On 9 May 2012 23:39, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:48 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Here is the command to fix this:
>>
>> modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=hwright,ssc
>
> Done, thanks!
Thanks!
> IIUC this only happens with existing Apache committers who join as
> podling com
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> ...The situation here sounds similar to other podlings that have ended up
> in a limbo with no active mentors to guide them. We definitely need
> better ways of detecting and dealing with such situations before they
> start blocking progr
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> The Stanbol release is imminent, the seventh (!) release candidate has
> just been voted on and should hit this list in the next few days.
Excellent, congratulations on the release!
> As a Stanbol mentor I'm impressed by the effo
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Lucene.NET!
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Apache Wiki wrote:
> One of the mentors (Stefan Bodewig) has indicated he wants to start pushing
> for graduation. UPDATE: Unfortunately, we have not made any progress on this
> - hopefully we can have a more conclusive upd
Jukka:
Thanks my friend. The way you have been running the IPMC during your
tenure as chair addresses just about everything I have ever bitched
about regarding the Incubator. I really appreciate what you are doing
and the time it must take to do it, but it does not go unnoticed.
- Origina
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I really appreciate what you are doing
> and the time it must take to do it
+1
I'd add that it's become easier to view the Incubator from a project
perspective, as these meta-reviews sharpen the focus on what problems
incubation is supposed
On 9 May 2012 23:11, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
...
>> Legal JIRA raised on 30/4/2011 at
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-134 - looks like it will
>> be resolved soon but mentors should have provided this advice 18 months ago.
>
>
In reviewing the Amabari report, I have a couple of notes/concerns:
* The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch. A recent code
change has sparked project interest, but list activity was non existent after
January.
*As Ambari went nearly 2 months without a single e-mail
On 10 May 2012 01:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> *As Ambari went nearly 2 months without a single e-mail to the list, I
> think an issue for graduation should be added that the community must
> demonstrate viability for X more reporting periods (where x IMO is > 2).
I just had a look at th
I have reviewed the flex report and community and didn't find any major issues.
The small things I found are:
1) The report appears to be written by a single person
2) This person appears to be disheartened a bit ("We expect the initial RC's to
be rejected as we finalize licensing and other p
Hi,
Thanks for the review Matt!
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
> * The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch. A recent code
>change has
> sparked project interest, but list activity was non existent after January.
Sounds like the project communit
Actually we discovered after this draft report had been written that we are not
supposed to report this month. It should probably be removed from the incubator
report.
I would not classify the attitude about the RC as negativity. The project is
complex with a long history and I imagine it will
On 5/9/2012 6:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Jukka:
>
> Thanks my friend. The way you have been running the IPMC during your
> tenure as chair addresses just about everything I have ever bitched
> about regarding the Incubator. I really appreciate what you are doing
> and the time it must take to
On May 9, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> Actually we discovered after this draft report had been written that we are
> not supposed to report this month. It should probably be removed from the
> incubator report.
>
> I would not classify the attitude about the RC as negativity. The pr
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
> In reviewing the Amabari report, I have a couple of notes/concerns:
>
> * The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch. A recent code
> change has sparked project interest, but list activity was non existent after
> Ja
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Sounds like the project community still needs to learn how to develop
> code out in the open. The massive revision 1335750 [1] seems to have
> been based on no open discussion on the mailing list or the issue
> tracker.
There is a new code b
Hey Guys,
OK, so it was developed in private, that'll need to be fixed, but it sounds like
you are pushing to have it brought out into the open, so good job here,
Owen.
If you need mentor help to nudge the project along, let me know and I will
be happy to scope and help out. I'll start out by jo
31 matches
Mail list logo
