Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
> It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
> being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
> openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and hobby needs.
You think Apache Harmony is a comparable
> Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
>> It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
>> being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
>> openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and hobby needs.
>
> You think Apache Harmony is a com
The 72 hour lazy consensus period has elapsed and the vote has passed.
By my tally, we have:
* 8 +1's from IPMC Members
* 9 +1's from other folks
IPMC members: (binding votes)
Ralph Goers
Leo Simons
Niall Pemberton
Emmanuel Lecharny
Julien Vermillard
Yoav Shapira
Patrick Hunt
Tom White
Please vote on the release cndidate for Apache Droids Incubating,
version 0.1-incubating. I've received one binding IPMC +1 votes and 2
non-binding +1 votes.
PPMC release vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-droids-dev/201106.mbox/%3c4de7d6cc.8080...@apache.org%3E
So
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> [X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
>
> Comment: While I favor focusing on the reference implementation for ODF, as
> my previous comments reflect, I believe th
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
Dw*.
*: who is in a - what the hack mood - and thinks that get this code base in a
state where people can start hacking is better than let it bitrot any further.
And fully trust the incubator process to attic the code & jettison the
commun
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+/- 0 (non binding)
I am still going back and forth, on whether or not.
against:
I understand very well most of the arguments from André
https://mail
+1 [binding]
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Mathias
On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache
Hi,
On 10 June 2011 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
> Apache Incubator project.
>
+1 (non-binding)
Andrew.
--
asav...@apache.org / cont...@andrewsavory.co
+1 (not binding)
Trying to establish a layer of common infrastructure for Open Document
Format processors looks a worthy attempt, even with all the warnings and
caveats.
I was Incubator PMC member till recently, and I could have re-joined to
vote. It looks like cheating, though.
Regards
Santiago
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
> Apache Incubator project.
+1 (non-binding)
/niklas
--
+1 non-bindung
> From Sam Ruby
> Subject[VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> Date Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:02:44 GMT
>
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice
On 2011/5/12 9:5 Manfred A. Reiter wrote:
>Nearly the whole and very active community in Brasil switched to LO. A
>lot of very brilliant and active members of the german community are
>working now at LO, doing a very good job.
In General, the Brazilian users keeps using BrOffice. BrOffice has ch
+1 binding. Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling
there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community
out of the group. While I am optimistic, I am reminded of Roy's cautions
about "piling on" [1] to a prospective podling, and am not entirely convi
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Mathias
On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache
On Jun 11, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>
> Since Oracle was willing to transfer the OOo source code copyrights to
> the ASF, the ASF could have accepted those copyrights,
> extract the related code for the ODF reference implementation, and
> re-release the source code with a copyle
On Jun 12, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
>> It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
>> being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
>> openness can walk the path between corporate, startup
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
(binding)
- Shane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:12 PM, IngridvdM wrote:
> [x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
>
> I would like to humbly beg you people from Apache for giving a chance to
> those who are willing to join you. I am deeply sorry
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
> Andy,
>
> Fáilte! Sounds like you get the "Apache Way" just great :-)
+1
> "I don't really have any background in this, but [... list of awesome
> things you've already done.]"
>
> Willing hands are always welcome, and a dose of humility c
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I would like to see a future for OOo and i hope that this can be a new
start. A few words to myself because i wasn't really visible here on the
list so far. My name is Juergen Schmidt (jsc) and I have worked on the
project since 1997. Proba
Sorry, I used a wrong mail address and then resent my vote with the
correct one; please ignore this mail.
Regards,
Mathias
On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Mathias
On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSIO
Sorry,
this was a mistake, I used a wrong mail address; ignore this posting,
please.
regards,
Mathias
On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Mathias
On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
Btw, your mails appear to be sent twice to the ML. I recognized that
before already...
Cheers
Daniel
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> this was a mistake, I used a wrong mail address; ignore this posting,
> please.
>
> regards,
> Mathias
>
> On 12.06.2011 15:51,
On 6/12/2011 4:03 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> Not that much;
> * Same players.
> * Same importance.
Really?
I'm pretty certain there is < 0.05% overlap between the Office Suite
and Java Runtime mechanics of either Sun or IBM. They probably never
even shared so much as a VP, although I could
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
-Bertrand, who agrees with Dirk.
On Sunday, June 12, 2011, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
> *: who is in a - what the hack mood - and thinks that get this code base in
> a state where people can start hacking is better than let it bitrot any
>
I vote -1 for the reasons I said here:
http://markmail.org/message/w5vtsa5nbarmnqxo
Niall
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> dow
Please ignore my vote below (duplicate).
I first used the wrong email address, which is not subscribed, then used
the correct one, and didn't expect that someone would moderate the list
and let the first one through...
Malte.
On 11.06.2011 17:59, Malte Timmermann wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Ma
29 matches
Mail list logo
