+1 binding. Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community out of the group. While I am optimistic, I am reminded of Roy's cautions about "piling on" [1] to a prospective podling, and am not entirely convinced that it's necessarily a good thing that we promote the idea of "getting in on the ground floor" wrt new podlings.
[1]- http://s.apache.org/VT5 ----- Original Message ---- > From: Niklas Gustavsson <nik...@protocol7.com> > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Sun, June 12, 2011 11:21:26 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding > > down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an > > Apache Incubator project. > > +1 (non-binding) > > /niklas > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
