On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> After much thought, I am voting -1 for 1 main reason.
>>
>> 1: From the get-go, this appears headed towards an umbrella project.
>> Too many ways to justify "yeah, this belongs h
On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski
wrote:
After much thought, I am voting -1 for 1 main reason.
1: From the get-go, this appears headed towards an umbrella project.
I've received feedback form Niclas that this VOTE email showed up in his
email client as part of a previous thread and was easily lost. This is just
a heads up that it's a new vote thread for the 1.3-rc3 release candidate :)
Cheers,
-T
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> All
+1
Matthieu
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> >
> > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> > Cassandra 0.4.0-rc2. We would now like to request the approval of the
> > Incubator PMC for this
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>> I'm curious though, when you say "...which makes me whinge just enough
>> to not give a +1", is that hypothetical, or is there feedback that we
>> could incorporate so that you would actuall
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
After much thought, I am voting -1 for 1 main reason.
1:
2009/9/16 Jim Jagielski :
>
> On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
...
>> IMO this is more a graduation issue, rather than something that should
>> prevent entry to the incubator - since thats when destination is
>> decided. There are many possible outcomes from that - perhaps some
>
Hey,
We would like to get one more IPMC VOTE to release!
Why I complained about Incubator Project Release Procedure last time! I
started a release process at September 1 and still we are trying to release
something!
We have already learned those things and rules that how Apache works! We
want to
The vote is now closed with the following results:
* +1 votes: 4 (Ant Elder, Paul Querna, Leo Simons, Matthieu Riou)
* 0 votes: 0
* -1 votes: 0
The vote passes.
Thanks everyone.
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 12:14 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release
+1
Niall
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
>
> OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
> Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
> defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.
>
> There
On 14/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
>
> OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
> Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
> defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.
>
> There are two *binding* +1 VO
>>>There is no ASF e-mail attached to the key.
>>>Also, I could not fetch the key from the MIT PGP server.
>>>(blocking)
>>>The key should really be signed by some other ASF people to tie it in
>>>to a Web of Trust
>>>(not blocking)
I always published other releases with this public key. You can l
Hi;
The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
successful.
There are three +1 binding
+1 Votes
-
* Kevan Miller (binding)
* Matthias Wessendorf (binding)
* Niall Pemberton (binding)
I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator "dist/" place and
u
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
wrote:
> Hi;
>
> The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is
> successful.
>
> There are three +1 binding
The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an i
On 16/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> >>>There is no ASF e-mail attached to the key.
The key should have some indication that it belongs to an ASF committer.
Just add your ASF e-mail to the key and re-release.
> >>>Also, I could not fetch the key from the MIT PGP server.
> >>>(blocking)
>
>
Hi Niall;
>>>The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it
>>>when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good
>>>etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a
>>>vote.
>>>"Votes should generally be permitted to run for at leas
Hi;
I think it is more meaningful to cancel VOTE to apply Sebb concerns and create
a new release!
Thanks;
--Gurkan
From: Gurkan Erdogdu
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:01:50 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWe
Here we go again :-)
Hi,
We just created an other release candidate for 2.0.5-incubating (rc6).
Our community approved the release so we now have a second binding
voting round for IPMC Members/Mentors.
fixes since previous rc5:
- examples not uploaded to the maven repository any more
- tutorial
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's first milestone
> release (PhotArk M1-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval
> to publish the release.
>
> Please review and vote on approving the M1-incubating release
> artifa
19 matches
Mail list logo
