Hi; I think it is more meaningful to cancel VOTE to apply Sebb concerns and create a new release!
Thanks; --Gurkan ________________________________ From: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:01:50 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 Hi Niall; >>>The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it >>>when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good >>>etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a >>>vote. >>>"Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to >>>provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate >>>regardless of their geographic locations." >>>from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html I have already know those rules!. Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses! >>>Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good >>>etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a >>>vote. I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release! If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we will try to be perfect :) Thanks; --Gurkan ________________________________ From: Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi; > > The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is > successful. > > There are three +1 binding The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a vote. "Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate regardless of their geographic locations." from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html "The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed." from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making Niall > +1 Votes > ----------------- > * Kevan Miller (binding) > * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) > * Niall Pemberton (binding) > > > I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator "dist/" place and > upload to m3-incubator-repository > > Thanks to all; > > -- Gurkan > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
