Hi,
sounds like interesting stuff. I would like to be added to the initial
committer list as well :)
Thanks
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
I've added both Jean-Sebastien and you to the proposal.
2009/9/11 Carsten Ziegeler :
> Hi,
>
> sounds like interesting stuff. I would like to be added to the initial
> committer list as well :)
>
> Thanks
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziege...@apache.org
>
>
As discussion is settling down, I'd like to aim for Tuesday next week
(15 Sept) to call a vote.
Peter, does that give you time to supply your initial set of committers?
Thanks,
Jeremy
2009/9/10 Jeremy Hughes :
> 2009/9/10 Peter Peshev :
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>> Thanks , we would need a few more days
Hi Jeremy,
No I don't feel strongly for this, I am not suggesting a change of the
proposal, I am just trying to build a detailed picture for myself
(and perhaps for the community) what exactly some parts of Aries
project would look like. I am not Apache experienced, so I am not
sure whether I sh
Hi Jeremy,
Yes, I would try to do that on Monday morning
Best Regards
Peter
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> As discussion is settling down, I'd like to aim for Tuesday next week
> (15 Sept) to call a vote.
>
> Peter, does that give you time to supply your initial set of
I'm also interested in the Aries project and would like to sign up as an
initial committer, especially in the area of distributed OSGi. I have been
the key contributor in Apache Tuscany project to enable the runtime with
OSGi and implement the OSGi remote services (originally RFC 119) using SCA
This vote is being cancelled because it was lapped by the next proposed
release candidate, (and because no one would vote for it).
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 10:40 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like t
On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
> now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our
> previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release
> candidate.
>
> These are the
On 11/09/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
> > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our
> > previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a f
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-rc2. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
structured key-value store.
Podling vote thread:
http:/
Peter Peshev wrote:
Anyway - after reading the proposal , my mental model for Aries is the
following - a group of bundles or web archives (here comes RFC 66 )
are grouped via a new extended SCA component type (
implementation.osgi_application) or perhaps inherit from the
implementation.jee tha
>> Distribution files are located here
>> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/
>
> The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents.
I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal.
>
> They both look completely wrong to me, as they contain raw class files
>
Hi Sebb,
thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about your
verdict.
However I have problems to reproduce your findings.
I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from
http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/
The only difference I could find, was that the zi
>> > [X] -1
>>
>> Distribution archives are broken.
>
> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files.
That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice
files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us
to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the fu
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
>>> > [X] -1
>>>
>>> Distribution archives are broken.
>>
>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files.
>
> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice
> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L?
Hi Rainer,
> The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains 5
> empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and content
> of the files do match.
could you tell me which ones those are?
>
> Also I could not find any raw class files or eclipse proj
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere
> wrote:
> [X] -1
Distribution archives are broken.
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files.
>>
>> That war contains jar's that each contain their
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
>
> Hi Rainer,
>
> > The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains
> 5 empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and
> content of the files do match.
>
> c
On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> >> Distribution files are located here
> >> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/
> >
> > The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents.
>
>
> I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal.
>
>
> >
> > The
On 11/09/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about
> your verdict.
>
> However I have problems to reproduce your findings.
> I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from
> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-
On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere
>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere
> > wrote:
> > [X] -1
>
> Distribution archives are broken.
> >>>
> >>> Maven artifacts don't have
21 matches
Mail list logo
