Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries.
Imagine there is library X which was developed by only 2 developers.
They want to bring this code to Commons. What to do? IP clearance is
one thing. But what about the 2 developers? Just make them committers
while they have no clue about A
Hi,
I don't think there is much overlap between Kalumet and Ace. And even if
there was, I don't see very much OSGi being used (pity, but true) - and that
makes for me autodeploy (or Kalumet :) ) useful on its own.
Mylène
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> IMHO apache needs to be more active at getting it's corpus into the
> distributions. for a long time, the Java Trap stuff was a major social
> barrier but that should dead and gone now. (isn't it?)
Ish. Dusting off my Linux systems m
On 04/09/2009 02:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Chris Chabot wrote:
Ps, Hans De Goede has a bit more experience with several distro's then me
and offered to help out too, i've added him to the CC list.
great :-)
Hi all,
I hope non subscriber posts t
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 04/09/2009 02:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> what about dependencies?
>>
>
> I assume you mean libraries / other software on which the project
> you want to package depends. Chances are good most are already packaged
> if not yo
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Joining the Apache community is great news, gives more visibility to
> the SocialSite community and ... lets an opportunity to the project to
> not simply die.
My thoughts exactly.
> Worthwhile initiative, thanks Dave!
>
> As Shindig PMC,
--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> From: Torsten Curdt
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 5:32 AM
> Well, the point is: we are
> talking about small libraries.
>
> Imagine there is library X which was devel
Hi Todd,
+1 (non-binding)
Checked the following:
- NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER is in place
- RAT report looks good
- Built with JDK 1.6, Windows XP, Ant 1.7
Looks good to go :)
kind regards
bob
Todd Volkert wrote:
Our voting period expires in less than 24 hours, and our two mentors
hav
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>> IMHO apache needs to be more active at getting it's corpus into the
>> distributions. for a long time, the Java Trap stuff was a major social
>> barrier but that should dea
Our voting period has expired, and we received three +1 votes, only
two of which are binding. http://tinyurl.com/d9z296 states "Three +1
Incubator PMC votes are required", so can one more PMC member please
make sure the release looks ok?
Thanks,
-T
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Todd Volkert w
El vie, 10-04-2009 a las 18:45 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin escribió:
(...)
> the advantage of being the upstream is that it's usually easier for us
> to get stuff developed than the distros so long as we understand what
> they need.
>
What they need is pretty obvious:
- explicit runtime dependenc
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Aidan Skinner
> wrote:
> (Apache and RMS saw Java a little differently: an opportunity as
> opposed to a trap. Apache has always been confident in our ability to
> - if necessary - develop a new v
Hi.
I think that Matt have well explained needs for Commons Incubator . In
addition to that, this is a short story from my experience. One month ago, I
introduced my component called as Robust-Task through Commons mailing and
Incubator mailing. There were some opinions for my component and I thoug
13 matches
Mail list logo
