Hi,
On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
> Pig project.
+1
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
Doug Cutting wrote:
> I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
> proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad
> interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build a
> diverse developer community.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigPropos
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad
interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build a
diverse developer community.
http://wiki.apache.org/in
Ok, we have made a couple of bug fixes and, more importantly, we have
softened the bouncy castle dependency and will no longer ship that jar.
This release has been well tested and reviewed and has received the
requisite number of +1's from the committers.
The release candidate can be found here:
The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
DAS beta2 (1.0-incubating-beta2). The vote thread is here ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg24045.html
The artifacts, including the binary and source distributions, the RAT
reports, and the Maven
On 9/27/07, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, we have made a couple of bug fixes and, more importantly, we have
> softened the bouncy castle dependency and will no longer ship that jar.
> This release has been well tested and reviewed and has received the
> requisite number of +1's fr
Yo,
On 9/27/07, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, we have made a couple of bug fixes and, more importantly, we have
> softened the bouncy castle dependency and will no longer ship that jar.
> This release has been well tested and reviewed and has received the
> requisite number of +1
This vote has been open for almost a week on cxf-dev and over 72 hours on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm closing the vote.
Results:
+1 IPMC binding: jim, jgenender, jstrachan, mriou
+1 CXF: dkulp, gnodet, njiang, apaibir, pjones, ubhole, blin, jgawor,
ddiephouse, ffang, jma, jmao, jliu
No other vo
This vote has been open for almost a week on cxf-dev and over 72 hours on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm closing the vote.
+1 IPMC binding: jim, jgenender, jstrachan
+1 CXF: dkulp, eglynn, jliu, ffang, jma, jmao, gnodet, njiang, apaibir,
pjones, ubhole, blin, jgawor, ddiephouse
+1 Other: keyteem
No
On Sep 27, 2007, at 12:45 PM, James M Snell wrote:
Ok, we have made a couple of bug fixes and, more importantly, we have
softened the bouncy castle dependency and will no longer ship that
jar.
This release has been well tested and reviewed and has received the
requisite number of +1's from
On 9/27/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. No ASF Copyright in your NOTICE files. As described here -- http://
> www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice. There should be a
> copyright notice for the work that's occurring within the Abdera
> project, itself.
Umm, yes it is. It'
I'm not so sure any of these issues are serious enough to block the release
so I'm going still to give it a +1.
Most of the missing license headers are not in significant files and the top
level LICENSE is there in the distributions which is the main thing, and I
don't think LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAI
I will go ahead and add the disclaimer to the jars as there are folks
who use MAVEN to build and it's likely the jars will end up included in
some repos somewhere separately from the main dist package. I am also
adding a copyright 2006-2007 statement to the NOTICE and the copyright
headers to the
What are people thoughts on how strict reviews should be when saying an
issue is serious enough to block a podling release?
Current incubator release policy is described at:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
Some things said there are:
"No release made by a P
On Sep 27, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 9/27/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. No ASF Copyright in your NOTICE files. As described here --
http://
www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice. There should be a
copyright notice for the work that's occurring within
Hey,
On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are people thoughts on how strict reviews should be when saying an
> issue is serious enough to block a podling release?
This is somewhat subjective, which is not bad in my book. We're all
trying to balance at least two serious conside
On 9/27/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 27, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> > On 9/27/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> 2. No ASF Copyright in your NOTICE files. As described here --
> >> http://
> >> www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
On Sep 27, 2007, at 5:14 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
AIUI this is the collective copyright and so i think that this should
be the year of release
That makes sense. Learned something new... Thanks for the info!
--kevan
---
Done. New zips, same place. The incubation disclaimer was just added to
the end of the notice file.
http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera/0.3.0
- James
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> [snip]
> The other comments in your mail are valid, and I'm sure James will fix
> them along with the few files th
On Friday 28 September 2007 05:12, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Personally, that's my take on it, and what I've done historically.
I agree with Yoav, but would like to add that I personally have different
standards for different podlings, i.e.
- The sooner one can expect graduation -> higher bar.
-
I think there's a missing notice that you should add in your NOTICE file for
Derby. Also JSTL is listed in your LICENSE file although I don't think it's
part of the release (unless I've missed it). Everything else looks fine.
Nothing critical, here's my +1.
Matthieu
On 9/27/07, Luciano Resende <
+1 from me.
I can't see any issues that haven't already been mentioned here or over on
tuscany-dev.
...ant
On 9/27/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
> DAS beta2 (1.0-incubating-beta2). The vote thread is h
22 matches
Mail list logo
