On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:17:44AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >>Mentors:
> >
> > One more would be good :-)
>
> First, I'm of the camp that the right number of mentors is one, but I
> respect that others differ on this.
*shrug*. What's in a name...I'll be less brief below :-)
> Second, no matter h
(this is a rant and the beginnings of a proposal which has nothing to do
in particular with James, ActiveMQ, or its release)
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:11:35PM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
> In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
> ActiveMQ community has voted on and ap
Leo Simons wrote:
> People are doing stuff, trying to comply with all kinds of policies,
> and then instead of self-governing they have to go ask permission.
> When you need to ask for it, you're not self-governing.
Self-governance is a learned behavior, and one of the things that the
Incubator
On Jun 2, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
(this is a rant and the beginnings of a proposal which has nothing
to do
in particular with James, ActiveMQ, or its release)
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:11:35PM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see
Hi Venkat,
You have my attention.
Reddy, Venkat wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I work for CA (formerly called as Computer Associates), and currently
> I’m a committer on couple of apache projects in the web services area.
> This is regarding donating JXplorer, a CA product, to Apache Directory
> projec
I like the idea of automation.
What would be even more helpful would be a default Apache project
setup, with a maven release target that builds a release in the right
format.
If the project structure started out with LICENSE, NOTICE, JAR targets
that put those in META-INF, places to put auxiliar
Shame on me for not cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here's the notification
of the vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hen
On 5/29/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vote passed for Jeff to be invited to become a committer.
+1's from:
Dave Johnson
Matt Raible
Elias Torres
Anil Gangolli
Lance Lavando
Agreed. Any tools that help incubating projects get off to the right
start we be a good start. Even if it's just a check list that has all
the things that have been found to be missing before in previous
attempted releases would be a great idea.
On 6/2/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Cliff has been doing so. Frankly, I suspect that many ASF projects need to
clean up their releases to conform with the currently solidifying ASF-wide
guidelines, but the Incubator PMC is more aware of them, and more diligent
in applying them.
From the perspective of being involved in one of
On 5/30/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 5/27/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release?
>> >
>>
>> I had the same question relating
Hiram Chirino wrote:
On 5/30/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 5/27/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release?
>> >
>>
>> I had the
11 matches
Mail list logo
