[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-12) Process_Description.html navigation improvement

2006-01-15 Thread Gavin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-12?page=comments#action_12362776 ] Gavin commented on INCUBATOR-12: Apologies for the incorrect patch, still not worked my way round the site completely. Regarding left-hand navigation, what did people have

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-10) Incubation_Policy.html should specify to use the Incubator PMC

2006-01-15 Thread Gavin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-10?page=comments#action_12362778 ] Gavin commented on INCUBATOR-10: The original description quotes from the 'Proposal' section of this page. Further down the same page under the heading 'Sponsor' has simila

Outstanding Issues - (was Re: [jira] Updated: (INCUBATOR-12) Process_Description.html navigation improvement)

2006-01-15 Thread Gav....
- Original Message - From: "David Crossley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 7:25 AM Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (INCUBATOR-12) Process_Description.html navigation improvement | Gav wrote: | > The website mentions updating the 'source html' files in site-a

[VOTE] AJAX Toolkit Proposal - Updated

2006-01-15 Thread Sam Ruby
The discussion has died down, and the time has come to call for a VOTE to see if the incubator wants to sponsor and accept this proposal for incubation. Recap: * This has been scaled back - no umbrella or Eclipse plugins here. If accepted, it will be entirely up to the ASF to determine how

Re: [VOTE] AJAX Toolkit Proposal - Updated

2006-01-15 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. -- dims PS: why was eclipse plugins removed? (/me lazy to browse all the emails again!) On 1/15/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The discussion has died down, and the time has come to call for a VOTE > to see if the incubator wants to sponsor and accept this proposal for > i

Re: ajax proposal?

2006-01-15 Thread Martin Cooper
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Martin Cooper wrote: On 1/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??

Re: ajax proposal?

2006-01-15 Thread Martin Cooper
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Martin Marinschek wrote: We could of course also set-up quality standards which have to be fullfilled before the project _leaves_ incubation. That's a good bar to set... As the name "MyFaces" has been mentioned quite a bit, I'll explain our situation. We currently use the

Re: ajax proposal?

2006-01-15 Thread Martin Cooper
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Jan 5, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: On 1/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote

Re: ajax proposal?

2006-01-15 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 14:36 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Jan 5, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: Sanjiva and I have experience with Apache SOAP. Two rewrites later, and there is a thriving community working on Apache Axis2. The goal here is