At 01:39 AM 3/9/2005, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
See Roy's message about the need to update the status file. One would
expect that this is simply an oversight, and that the Logging PMC did not
vote for a release with IP issues still open.
Indeed, the software grant was sent to Jim sometime in January
The foundation records attest that a software grant has been signed by
Richard Hobbs of Neoworks Limited for the log4net source code. Public
mailing lists indicate that this was done around 2004-01-26 after which the
software was imported into the logging-log4net CVS repository.
The foundation
To summarize:
1) The foundation records attest that a software grant for log4net has been
received by the foundation.
2) All log4net committers have sent in their signed CLAs.
3) All code in the logging-log4net CVS repository is Apache licensed.
4) Log4net does not depend on any third party libra
I am quite embarrassed to ask but what is the foundation's position on
distributing code which depends on the following environments?
- Mono 1.0 (GPL)
- Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 & 1.1 & Compact Framework 1.0 (Closed Source)
- Microsoft SSCLI 1.0 (Shared Source)
It seems very similar to the si
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Nicko Cadell has compiled a list [1] of additional log4net dependencies.
Could someone of a higher authority confirm that they are OK? In
particular, log4net is built using GPL-licensed Nant, is that a problem
from the foundation's point of view?
I obviously don't speak with an
Ceki,
Am not assuming "higher authority"...as a peer, i don't see any
problems, as you don't have their code in our CVS/SVN and release
artifacts.
-- dims
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:22:51 +0100, Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am quite embarrassed to ask but what is the foundation's p
> what is the foundation's position on distributing code
> which depends on the following environments?
> - Mono 1.0 (GPL)
> - Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 & 1.1 & Compact Framework 1.0 (Closed
Source)
> - Microsoft SSCLI 1.0 (Shared Source)
How does that differ from code that depends upon Java,
On Mar 9, 2005, at 3:00 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 01:39 AM 3/9/2005, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
See Roy's message about the need to update the status file. One would
expect that this is simply an oversight, and that the Logging PMC did
not
vote for a release with IP issues still open.
Indeed, the soft
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
I am quite embarrassed to ask but what is the foundation's position on
distributing code which depends on the following environments?
- Mono 1.0 (GPL)
- Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 & 1.1 & Compact Framework 1.0 (Closed Source)
- Microsoft SSCLI
> > The release package includes project files for Microsoft
> Visual Studio
> > .NET, however this is not a dependency.
>
> Does this mean these are files copied from (perhaps modified,
> perhaps not) the Microsoft product, which originally carried
> a Microsoft copyright? Or are these fre
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Nicko Cadell wrote:
The release package includes project files for Microsoft
Visual Studio
.NET, however this is not a dependency.
Does this mean these are files copied from (perhaps modified,
perhaps not) the Microsoft product, which originally carried
a Microsoft copyright?
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-01-20 01:12:13 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2005) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
> > what is the foundation's position on distributing code
> which depends
> > on the following environments?
>
> > - Mono 1.0 (GPL)
> > - Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 & 1.1 & Compact Framework 1.0 (Closed
> Source)
> > - Microsoft SSCLI 1.0 (Shared Source)
>
> How does that differ from code
13 matches
Mail list logo
