Ceki, Am not assuming "higher authority"...as a peer, i don't see any problems, as you don't have their code in our CVS/SVN and release artifacts.
-- dims On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:22:51 +0100, Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am quite embarrassed to ask but what is the foundation's position on > distributing code which depends on the following environments? > > - Mono 1.0 (GPL) > - Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 & 1.1 & Compact Framework 1.0 (Closed Source) > - Microsoft SSCLI 1.0 (Shared Source) > > It seems very similar to the situation encountered by all our projects > based on the Java language which is licensed under somewhat ambiguous terms. > > Nicko Cadell has compiled a list [1] of additional log4net dependencies. > Could someone of a higher authority confirm that they are OK? In > particular, log4net is built using GPL-licensed Nant, is that a problem > from the foundation's point of view? > > [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4net-dev&m=111037622301905&w=2 > > -- > Ceki Gülcü > > The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
