Matt Liotta wrote:
Indeed, the proposal doesn't seem to be inline with the document in two
ways. First, there is no active development community for it. Second,
while the project was originally commercial in nature, we are no longer
doing development on it as it currently suits our needs. That
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
it would be nice to create "We are under incubation" icon
See: http://incubator.apache.org/images/apache-incubator-logo.png
Here you can also find them in different sizes and background colors:
http://cvs.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/apachelogos/
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi
Apart from the general agreement on PPMCs, for this particular vote
instance there has been a +1 from me, one from Noel, on with changes
from Aaron and a positive comment from Leo.
Thus, and also given the rule we have tacitly agreed upon on the pmc
list that the votes of this PMC are considere
On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 13:42, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Apart from the general agreement on PPMCs, for this particular vote
> instance there has been a +1 from me, one from Noel, on with changes
> from Aaron and a positive comment from Leo.
>
> Thus, and also given the rule we have tacitly agre
Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
...
Hosting the Axion site under
incubator.apache.org means that Axion will need to set up a different
site generation and publication process than the one it will use once it
is part of the DB project.
> These processes will need to be
replaced/reworked once Axion is promote
Nicola,
I only have one overall thought (and you're going to think it remarkable
picky, especially at this late stage :>). As an aside - is this on the
wiki somewhere where we can do a bit of wordsmithing (if you don't
object at such a late date :<. Am also happy to play around once it is
on
Cancel question about wiki - should have looked first.
Apologies - and a very Merry Christmas!
Cheers,
Berin
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Nicola,
I only have one overall thought (and you're going to think it remarkable
picky, especially at this late stage :>). As an aside - is this on the
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
The notion of automatically accepting projects already accepted by a
sponsor seems like a good one. It's not very clear from the process
docs that this is the case.
As said before, the docs are in need of a major overhaul. Hopefully,
somewhere in t
> Your administrative burden is *much* smaller. For example, by simply
> registering the project, you get a CVS server, a mailing list system,
> forums, a bug tracking system and all that stuff automatically.
I'm not sure that I understood the point. The infrastructure team does all
of those t
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/11/11 00:01:00 $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://Nagoya.Apache.Org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ApacheIncubatorProjectPages
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documenta
Matt Liotta wrote:
> the proposal doesn't seem to be inline with the document in two
> ways. First, there is no active development community for it.
> Second, [we] are no longer doing development on it
A community is important. It does not need to, and indeed it would be
better if it did not, com
11 matches
Mail list logo
