Re: Editing STATUS file

2003-11-17 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Noel J. Bergman wrote: I did this so that it's easier to start a project status file and keep track of it. I did not update the STATUS files though, as we need a new format for them. @see http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?NewProjectSTATUSTemplate Is there a difference between the proje

Re: Geronimo Policy and effect on community

2003-11-17 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
I have read all your mail in detail. Let me try to address and reply to your points very simply: 1 - Geronimo is not an Apache project, it's still in incubation. If it proves itself to be unable to work as Apache standards need it too, it will not become an Apache project. This is exactly

[RT] Incubated project websites

2003-11-17 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Guys, I really wanna try and nail this down this time. To minimize infrastructure work, we had decided on a policy that the projects get resources done in their final pmc destination, if it's defined. So if project X goes to the Y PMC, we would have: [EMAIL PROTECTED] y-x CVS module etc..

Re: [RT] Incubated project websites

2003-11-17 Thread Leo Simons
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Proposal: 1 - every project site sources stay in the project CVS sure. 2 - every project has this URL space where to publish the site: http://incubator.apache.org/projectname +1 (or under the wings of their TLP if they wish) 3 - every project has an incubation sta

Re: [RT] Incubated project websites

2003-11-17 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Leo Simons wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: ... 2 - every project has this URL space where to publish the site: http://incubator.apache.org/projectname +1 (or under the wings of their TLP if they wish) Actually this is the point. I tend to think that they should publish the site here always.

RE: [RT] Incubated project websites

2003-11-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > 2 - every project has this URL space where to publish the site: > > > http://incubator.apache.org/projectname > > +1 (or under the wings of their TLP if they wish) > Actually this is the point. I tend to think that

Re: [RT] Incubated project websites

2003-11-17 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: 2 - every project has this URL space where to publish the site: http://incubator.apache.org/projectname +1 (or under the wings of their TLP if they wish) Actually this is the point. I tend to think tha

Re: [RT] Incubated project websites

2003-11-17 Thread Leo Simons
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: 2 - every project has this URL space where to publish the site: http://incubator.apache.org/projectname +1 (or under the wings of their TLP if they wish) Actually this is the point. I tend to think that they should publish

RE: [RT] Incubated project websites

2003-11-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Continuously moving stuff around (like moving the lenya website now) > just means lots of work no-one likes to do. I agree that it is a pain. I think we need to establish a policy, even if we end up grandfathering some projects. --- Noel --

RE: [RT] Incubated project websites

2003-11-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> > Does this resolve the issues? > +1 & well said :-) OK, then shall we document it and help the projects get setup? Geronimo has been clamoring to have their site back. We can now tell them that they must have their published content in CVS, and that they should checkout /www/incubator.apa

RE: [RT] Incubated project websites

2003-11-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Leo, Leo Simons wrote: > cd $proj > maven site > cd target/docs > cvs -z3 -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvs \ > import -m 'Maven-generated site' incubator-site/build/site/$proj \ > maven_site Maven_Generated_$proj_Website_$(date +%Y%m%d) > > replace '$proj' with the project name, replace $my_id w