Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:02:59 +0200
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm the moderator there, and I didn't see your mail.
I apologise for missing it, it was not intentional. Sorry.
Okay, then can the config of the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be changed? When? Who? How
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:02:59 +0200
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm the moderator there, and I didn't see your mail.
> I apologise for missing it, it was not intentional. Sorry.
Okay, then can the config of the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be changed? When? Who? How?
---
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Roy,
Please note that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
list is suffering the same disease.
I said this before at that mailing list. Noone responded.
It (nonfeasance) really humiliated me.
I'm the moderator there, and I didn't see your mail.
I apologise for missing it, it was not intent
> Lists without "Reply-To" Header ...
If the PMC wants the list properties changed, perhaps because of requests
from the list users, they can submit a request to have the list
reconfigured.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:44:05 -0400
(Subject: RE: technology sucks)
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your comment
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=41)
> was about a Reply-To header.
Oh, yes. yes.
*** NOTE *** Lists witho
> Please note that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> list is suffering the same disease.
It looks to me that projects@ has both an owner and a moderator (although it
could use more moderators).
Your comment
(http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
he.org&msgNo=41) was about a Reply-To header.
Roy,
Please note that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
list is suffering the same disease.
I said this before at that mailing list. Noone responded.
It (nonfeasance) really humiliated me.
__ Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:50:26 -0700
(Subject: technology sucks)
So, it seems that much of our collective constipation on votes
over the past year has been due to the pmc mailing list being
without moderators or owner, apparently due to a strange
combination of options given when the list was created.
A couple of people are now moderators, and I just fixed the
l
