On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:44:05 -0400 (Subject: RE: technology sucks) "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your comment > (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=41) > was about a Reply-To header. Oh, yes. yes. *** NOTE *** Lists without "Reply-To" Header would be sure to become "inactive" lists soon ... E-mail cultures/histories had shown, proven. Quite, "technology sucks". I can easily imagine that many (especially, Paul Hammant) participants in that mailing list would have received *personal* mails which should go to the lists directly. The current config of infrastructure@ must be reasonable because that list is to become "HELP DESK", not "LIST FOR DISCUSSION". However, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" must be "LIST FOR DISCUSSION" and strengthen the [AltRMI], [FTPServer] communities. The apparent difference there might be. Again and again, Lists without "Reply-To" Header would be sure to become "inactive" lists soon. Regards, __ Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
