Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> For the recordWS-PMC is willing to accept the project after its successful
> incubation.
in that case i think we're all set, the incubator can (and does)
accept wsrp4j (ygh! that name! :-), and sam ruby, as the project's
shepherd, can see about getting the mailin
Ted Leung wrote:
> What is the exact licensing of pluto.jar?
It's not a *single* pluto.jar. The JARs pluto
generates are the portlet API JAR and the
reference impl. container JARs.
We are currently working on the licence.
In general we want to provide it royalty-free,
as-is, redistributable, etc.
Steven Noels wrote:
> Out of curiosity: what's the specific problem with pluto.jar? Who is
> still discussing stuff with lawyers (IIUC)?
That's me. The problem is that wsrp4j usese pluto *JARs*
which contain the portlet API classes and the JSR168 reference
impl. container. The code for these is n
On 1/08/2003 19:09 Davanum Srinivas wrote:
- There's Portlet API jar (named pluto.jar) that is required by both Charon and Jetspeed-2. The
Jetspeed-2 folks are working on it
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed-dev&m=105949774325419&w=2).
Questions:
- Is availability of pluto.jar file a Sho
On 8/1/2003 10:09 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Status update:
- Started the VOTE on WS-PMC. Will report back the results.
- There's Portlet API jar (named pluto.jar) that is required by both Charon and Jetspeed-2. The
Jetspeed-2 folks are working on it
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed-dev&
dims wrote:
>#1 - The code for wsrp4j that we will get will have everything needed for
WSRP4J to work in a
>Tomcat/Servlet Container...Right?
right
>#2 - Later the JSR 168 reference impl may/can be extracted into a separate
project...Right?
yes, it will be the pluto project. Currently there is no
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:52:17AM -0700, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> #1 - "-1 on the apparent process on how this "arrived"". Where EXACTLY is this
> process
> documented ("how/when should someone send a note to incubator about a
> project to get the
> ball rolling")
I was referring to t
Richard,
Bottom-line:
#1 - The code for wsrp4j that we will get will have everything needed for WSRP4J to
work in a
Tomcat/Servlet Container...Right?
#2 - Later the JSR 168 reference impl may/can be extracted into a separate
project...Right?
Thanks,
dims
--- Richard Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:55:13AM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>...
> > I'm also a -1 on the apparent process on how this "arrived" at the
> > Incubator.
>
> miscommunication, is all. i assumed from what i was told that
> everything was done and the actual incubation
first off all sorry if I break the thread, but I subscibed a few minutes
ago.
Let me try to bring light into the wsrp4j proposal confusion:
We intend to donate two projects: pluto and wsrp4j (formally named charon).
pluto is the JSR168 (Portlet spec) reference implementation, wrsp4j is the
implemen
Status update:
- Started the VOTE on WS-PMC. Will report back the results.
- There's Portlet API jar (named pluto.jar) that is required by both Charon and
Jetspeed-2. The
Jetspeed-2 folks are working on it
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed-dev&m=105949774325419&w=2).
Questions:
- Is avai
Greg Stein wrote:
>
> So how exactly was this projected "accepted"? I see zero discussion before
> Ken's post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That seems *very* inappropriate.
it hasn't been accepted, at least not by the incubator. oh,
you mean the sponsoring project. all i can say is what i was told
by sa
#1 - "-1 on the apparent process on how this "arrived"". Where EXACTLY is this process
documented ("how/when should someone send a note to incubator about a project
to get the
ball rolling")
#2 - I was a bit surprised that this note about Charon to incubator did not come from
either me
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> FYI, AFAIK Charon depends on JSR168 Impl - jetspeed2 (code
> checked in just a few days ago -
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-jetspeed-2/). So we should
> not have a problem.
>
I thought the JSR 168 Impl is the Pluto proposal
(http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/ap
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 07:06:13PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Ted Leung wrote:
> > I'm unclear as to the project destination here. Your message says its
> > WS and the proposal
> > says Jakarta. I just looked and couldn't find it. I also couldn't find
> > it in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A
Ted, Ken,
The dependent project was the JSR168 Impl which is Jetspeed2 (already in our CVS).
There's no
other dependencies that i know of.
Ted,
Yes, we've not voted on it yet in the WS-PMC. I will start the VOTE and get the
results back to
incubator folks.
Thanks,
dims
--- Ted Leung <[EMAIL P
Ted Leung wrote:
>
> I'm unclear as to the project destination here. Your message says its
> WS and the proposal
> says Jakarta. I just looked and couldn't find it. I also couldn't find
> it in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As long has voted to accept it, I've no problem. It's just that I'm on
> th
FYI, AFAIK Charon depends on JSR168 Impl - jetspeed2 (code checked in just a few days
ago -
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-jetspeed-2/). So we should not have a problem.
Thanks,
dims
--- Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ibm has a codebase that they want to open through
On 7/31/2003 2:30 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
they are ready to dot the eyes and cross the teas; they are
assembling the clas, will be executing the software grant
as soon as i get it to them, they have a community of developers,
they have a sponsoring asf project (web services) which is
eag
ibm has a codebase that they want to open through the asf. the
detailed proposal has already been posted on the apache wiki at
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?CharonProposal
by sam, several months ago.
they are ready to dot the eyes and cross the teas; they are
assembling the clas, w
20 matches
Mail list logo
