On 22 May 2017 at 21:40, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> On May 22, 2017, at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> Whimsy auto-subscribe only allows committers to use their ASF address
>>> or the ones listed in thei LDAP record.
FTR, the mail address attri
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> On May 22, 2017, at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> Whimsy auto-subscribe only allows committers to use their ASF address
>> or the ones listed in thei LDAP record.
>
> That seems, to me, a restriction that Whimsy should fix...
> None of my s
> On May 22, 2017, at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> Whimsy auto-subscribe only allows committers to use their ASF address
> or the ones listed in thei LDAP record.
>
That seems, to me, a restriction that Whimsy should fix...
None of my subscriptions to any private PMC lists that I'm on
are with
On 22 May 2017 at 12:58, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I don't think it matters... People use their @a.o emails for
> various reasons, as well as NOT use them for various reasons.
> I don't think we should 2nd guess or, even worse, intrude on
> people's ind. email practices, IMO.
>
>> On May 20, 2017, at
I don't think it matters... People use their @a.o emails for
various reasons, as well as NOT use them for various reasons.
I don't think we should 2nd guess or, even worse, intrude on
people's ind. email practices, IMO.
> On May 20, 2017, at 7:05 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> Dumb question time.
nything automatic happen that ensures that only committers'
>> addresses, or one of their preferred alternative addresses, are being used?
>> I'm suspecting not.
>
> Private list subscriptions are always moderated. Moderators have an
> obligation to verify that the email
email addresses to different lists is for some a lot
easier than trying to manage rules for which messages go into which folders.
>
> Does anything automatic happen that ensures that only committers'
> addresses, or one of their preferred alternative addresses, are being used?
>
+1 to use @apache.org addresses only.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Dumb question time.
>
> Should we encourage that @apache.org addresses are used when subscribing
> to
> a private PMC list; and if not all PMC members have subscribed on a
> podling, can one subscribe t
Dumb question time.
Should we encourage that @apache.org addresses are used when subscribing to
a private PMC list; and if not all PMC members have subscribed on a
podling, can one subscribe their @apache.org addresses for them?
Or should we mandate that @apache are used?
Does anything automatic
