Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote: > All, > > Obviously getting the accounts created for the wave committers could take a > little extra time given the holidays.  Just wondering if we have heard any > conformation that the process has started, or on the other hand if we ha

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

All, Obviously getting the accounts created for the wave committers could take a little extra time given the holidays. Just wondering if we have heard any conformation that the process has started, or on the other hand if we have missed something procedurally? Thanks. Michael On Dec 23, 201

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

I can't see why not forwarding it to Incubator PMC would hold root@ from creating the accounts (I mean, if it is such a big deal, root@ can always forward this message themselves and/or contact me to do it). Anyways, I just forwarded the original request. BTW, the original request was sent to r

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

FYI: I just filed Google's CCLA for Wave, including these committers: Alex North, Christian Ohler, Dan Danilatos, David Hearnden, David Wang, Soren Lassen. Craig On Dec 4, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On Dec 4, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Dan Peterson wrote: Michael, I believe that's corre

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On 23 December 2010 10:41, David Crossley wrote: > I wondered why the Wave initial committer accounts were not > yet set up. The wave-dev list indicates that it seems to be stalled. > (Please come to general@ and ask if ever there is a holdup.) > Thanks David. It does seem to be held up but with

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

I wondered why the Wave initial committer accounts were not yet set up. The wave-dev list indicates that it seems to be stalled. (Please come to general@ and ask if ever there is a holdup.) Yes Infra does do it in batches. However, one reason might be that the request for accounts might not have

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Actually those were there before I started the process of gathering committer ids. None of the last week CLAs are recorded yet. Andrus On Dec 13, 2010, at 2:09 AM, David Crossley wrote: > Upayavira wrote: >> >> At the same time, folks that don't have ICLAs recorded yet should send >> them in.

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Upayavira wrote: > > At the same time, folks that don't have ICLAs recorded yet should send > them in. I am not on the Wave dev mail list, but i can read that Andrus was waiting on the first batch of CLAs being recorded. The bottom of this page shows that some have now: http://people.apache.org/

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Tad Glines wrote: > According to this ( > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling), > once our mentors are added to the IPMC (assuming they where not already > members), one or more of them will initiate: Anyone who has commit access can do the steps.

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Dan Peterson wrote: > > > Michael, I believe that's correct -- it'd be great if you can take point > on > > hitting up the wave committers to submit their ICLAs. > > > > For Ian Roughley and myself, we already have

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Dec 4, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Dan Peterson wrote: > Michael, I believe that's correct -- it'd be great if you can take point on > hitting up the wave committers to submit their ICLAs. > > For Ian Roughley and myself, we already have them on file. I think we'll > just need to get karma when we get

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Dec 4, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote: > Ralph, > > If I understand correctly, an individual could submit an ICLA first and then > later submit the CCLA if the employer or situation requires it. Meaning that > previously submitting an ICLA would not be in conflict with a subsequ

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Michael, I believe that's correct -- it'd be great if you can take point on hitting up the wave committers to submit their ICLAs. For Ian Roughley and myself, we already have them on file. I think we'll just need to get karma when we get to that point. FYI -- for the Googlers, there is already a

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Ralph, If I understand correctly, an individual could submit an ICLA first and then later submit the CCLA if the employer or situation requires it. Meaning that previously submitting an ICLA would not be in conflict with a subsequent CCLA. If that is the case I would recommend all of the init

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 08:22 -0800, "Tad Glines" wrote: > According to this ( > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling), > once our mentors are added to the IPMC (assuming they where not already > members), one or more of them will initiate: > >-

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Tad Glines wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: >> >>> >>> Also, committers will not be issued accounts until their CLA (either ICLA >>> or >>> CCLA) has been received and recorded. Here's the

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote: Should those of us on the contributor list, just go ahead and get these submitted sooner rather than later? Yes, there's no need to wait for anyone else to do anything else. Contributors should just print, sign, scan, and email their ICL

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Should those of us on the contributor list, just go ahead and get these submitted sooner rather than later? On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Tad Glines wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: >> >>> >>> Also, committers will not

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: > >> >> Also, committers will not be issued accounts until their CLA (either ICLA >> or >> CCLA) has been received and recorded. Here's the new committers guide: >> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-commi

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: Also, committers will not be issued accounts until their CLA (either ICLA or CCLA) has been received and recorded. Here's the new committers guide: http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html. I'm fairly certain all committers needs to fill

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

Tad, Thanks. We had reviewed that page, I suppose what I was looking for was some clarity on who would be taking the lead on that and when we should expect to start certain activities. ~Michael On Dec 4, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: > According to this ( > http://incubator.apache.org/

Re: Wave Incubator Next Steps

According to this ( http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling), once our mentors are added to the IPMC (assuming they where not already members), one or more of them will initiate: - the reporting schedule; - the project status

Wave Incubator Next Steps

Wave Mentors, What are the logistics of boostrapping the Wave Podling? I assume most of the initial committers on the wave project do not have Apache Accounts already. I assume over the next several days we will start that process. Is there a good document that describes the boostraping proc