Michael, I believe that's correct -- it'd be great if you can take point on hitting up the wave committers to submit their ICLAs.
For Ian Roughley and myself, we already have them on file. I think we'll just need to get karma when we get to that point. FYI -- for the Googlers, there is already a CCLA on file. -Dan On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ralph, > > If I understand correctly, an individual could submit an ICLA first and > then later submit the CCLA if the employer or situation requires it. > Meaning that previously submitting an ICLA would not be in conflict with a > subsequent CCLA. If that is the case I would recommend all of the initial > committees for Wave get those in as soon as possible. Thanks. > > Regards, > Michael > > > On Dec 4, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Tad Glines wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Also, committers will not be issued accounts until their CLA (either > ICLA > >>>> or > >>>> CCLA) has been received and recorded. Here's the new committers guide: > >>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> I'm fairly certain all committers needs to fill out the ICLA, no? > >> > >> > >> Yes, I see. Reading this <http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas> further > I > >> see that all have to sign an ICLA, but for some their employer will need > to > >> submit a CCLA. > > > > It is usually the case that some will want their employer to submit a > CCLA rather than need to. The ICLA is the way an individual states that > they have the right to commit the software they contribute. If during the > course of their employment they are called upon to enhance or fix bugs in an > Apache project the ICLA is sufficient for them to do that provided they have > permission to do so from their employer. The CCLA protects the individual > in that case by explicitly stating the listed individuals have that right. > The CCLA is also one way a company can donate software directly to the ASF. > There are quite a few companies that don't want to submit a CCLA but will > allow their employees to contribute. In those cases it is up to the > individual to make sure they are protected should management changes occur, > etc. > > > > Ralph > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >