Thanks for the clarification Roy.
On 31 October 2012 05:29, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> [generic incubator comments -- nothing specific to CloudStack] ...
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM,
[generic incubator comments -- nothing specific to CloudStack] ...
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> But regardless, you couldn't. A single -1 vote would be
>>> enough to bl
Thanks for investigating this, Chip.
I am happy with us proceeding, but would caution us to think about
addressing or documenting this in a later release.
I'd say wait until tomorrow to see if anyone else objects then wrap up the
vote.
Let's ship this thing!
On 29 October 2012 16:21, Chip Child
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Bertrand, is a compressed archive of source a source or a binary?
>
> hehe...right, you said earlier in this thread that the file in
> question is actually just compressed
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> So, it's no more good (or bad) than shipping a .tar.bz2 of
>> some category A open source code (given the license).
>
> +1
>
> From your description, this is different from
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> So, it's no more good (or bad) than shipping a .tar.bz2 of
> some category A open source code (given the license).
+1
>From your description, this is different from a compiled object file, it's
compressed source. No information is lost
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Bertrand, is a compressed archive of source a source or a binary?
hehe...right, you said earlier in this thread that the file in
question is actually just compressed source code, is that correct?
If yes, it's just weird to include it in
Bertrand, is a compressed archive of source a source or a binary?
On Oct 29, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Nice summary Bertrand.
>
>
> On 29 October 2012 15:22, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
>> wrote:
>>> ...Waf is a packagin
Nice summary Bertrand.
On 29 October 2012 15:22, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > ...Waf is a packaging utility, used to create RPMs and DEBs. Work is
> > currently ongoing to remove it (and it's use) from the project
> > entirely
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> ...Waf is a packaging utility, used to create RPMs and DEBs. Work is
> currently ongoing to remove it (and it's use) from the project
> entirely...
> ...That will be several weeks of work (not days),
> which is significantly longer than
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Florian Holeczek
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Noah,
>>>
We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
of the source
On 29 October 2012 15:13, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> I'll try to be more clear next time. I'm holding the vote open
> specifically because of this outstanding question, *regardless* of the
> current tally. That's what I was expressing.
Understood. I suspected we were on the same page, but I wan
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> > Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
>> > misconception.
>> >
>> > On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Chi
Veto or none veto, binding or non-binding, a -1 vote is an indication of a
problem. Process for process sake is pointless and unproductive, so I don't
care about the technicalities. A good RM should be looking for excuses to
halt the release. (Even though he may strongly want the release to be
succ
Le 10/29/12 3:39 PM, Noah Slater a écrit :
Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
misconception.
On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers wrote:
I actually have more than enough votes right now to close the thread
out on the project's dev list, and open up a vote fo
On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
> > misconception.
> >
> > On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I actually have more than enough
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
> misconception.
>
> On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>>
>> I actually have more than enough votes right now to close the thread
>> out on the project's dev li
Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
misconception.
On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> I actually have more than enough votes right now to close the thread
> out on the project's dev list, and open up a vote for the IPMC.
No you don't.
To me, this
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Florian Holeczek wrote:
>> Hi Noah,
>>
>>> We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
>>> of the source:
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudst
Hi all,
I'm the RM for the release, so I wanted to provide some context to
Noah's question. Some of this has already been mentioned on the
project's vote thread, but I'll bring it up again here to see if there
are any thoughts to help us decide if this is a blocker or not. At
this point, I'm hol
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Florian Holeczek wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
>> We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
>> of the source:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
>>
>> It seems to be a sort of
Hi Noah,
> We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
> of the source:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
>
> It seems to be a sort of hybrid source/binary file. Very strange.
>
> Can we ship this?
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> ...We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
> of the source:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
>
> It seems to be a sort of hybrid source/binary
Hey,
We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
of the source:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
It seems to be a sort of hybrid source/binary file. Very strange.
Can we ship this?
Thanks,
--
NS
24 matches
Mail list logo
