On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> Bertrand, is a compressed archive of source a source or a binary?
>
> hehe...right, you said earlier in this thread that the file in
> question is actually just compressed source code, is that correct?

That's correct.  We ( the project ) were actually concerned that it
was compiled python code.  Benson is right.  In reality, it's just
compressed source.  I have extracted it and reviewed the contents.
It's the waf source.

> If yes, it's just weird to include it in that form but I agree that
> the "no binaries" problem is not that important then, if one can
> decompress and verify the actual source code. The reason we don't
> release binaries is that it's usually impossible to verify them as
> being harmless.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to