On 14/05/2010, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 10:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > Just curious. If a graduated project is sponsoring an incubation does
> > the podling *require* mentors? Isn't that the roll of the sponsoring PMC?
>
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_
On 05/13/2010 10:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Just curious. If a graduated project is sponsoring an incubation does
> the podling *require* mentors? Isn't that the roll of the sponsoring PMC?
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Sponsor
My understanding is t
Just curious. If a graduated project is sponsoring an incubation does
the podling *require* mentors? Isn't that the roll of the sponsoring
PMC?
Again, just curious.
Regards,
Alan
On May 1, 2010, at 6:44 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Also if Amber needs more mentors I can apply to join the inc
Hi Jean-Frederic,
thanks for mentoring us!
Simone
2010/5/3 jean-frederic clere
> On 04/29/2010 11:45 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> > The Shindig PMC has approved the proposal to sponsor the Amber project
> for
> > the Apache Incubator.
> >
> > 7 +1 votes were submitted. [Henning, Chirag, Chico, Pau
On 04/29/2010 11:45 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> The Shindig PMC has approved the proposal to sponsor the Amber project for
> the Apache Incubator.
>
> 7 +1 votes were submitted. [Henning, Chirag, Chico, Paul, Jacky, Santiago
> and Vincent]
> No 0 or -1 votes.
Cool, I added my self as mentor.
Cheer
That would be great, thanks.
p
On 2 May 2010, at 02:44, David Jencks wrote:
> Also if Amber needs more mentors I can apply to join the incubator
> pmc and be an additional mentor.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:43 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I'm interested in implementing
Also if Amber needs more mentors I can apply to join the incubator pmc and be
an additional mentor.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:43 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm interested in implementing jaspic (jsr 196) support if practical. This
> should allow Amber to provide container manag
I agree with Pid completely, let's wait for someone from Shiro to comment.
I suppose that every Apache project having a mechanism of resource
authorization has (or should have) in its road map to support OAuth, and
being Shiro a framework explicitly targeted at security it is obvious they
have OAu
On 30/04/2010 19:13, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Is there any chance that Amber could provide the OAuth plumbing for Shiro?
I'd hope so, but I'd be interested to hear any Shiro committers thoughts?
We think there's enough Apache projects with plans for, (or existing
v1.0), OAuth implementations that i
Is there any chance that Amber could provide the OAuth plumbing for Shiro?
Paul (who's looking forward to Shiro 1.0!)
On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> OAuth 2 support (client + server) is on the roadmap for Apache Shiro.
> Does this mean we could have potentially 2 Apache im
OAuth 2 support (client + server) is on the roadmap for Apache Shiro.
Does this mean we could have potentially 2 Apache implementations?
(Fine by me if necessary - let a million flowers bloom and all that
;)). Just curious...
Les
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Very i
Very interesting. You may want to ping the Shiro project. They may
be interested in this as well.
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
The Shindig PMC has approved the proposal to sponsor the Amber
project for
the Apache Incubator.
7 +1 votes were submitted. [
On 29/04/2010 23:43, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm interested in implementing jaspic (jsr 196) support if practical.
> This should allow Amber to provide container managed authentication in any
> jaspic enabled servlet container. I'm not familiar enough with OAuth to know
> if it makes sense to ha
I'm interested in implementing jaspic (jsr 196) support if practical. This
should allow Amber to provide container managed authentication in any jaspic
enabled servlet container. I'm not familiar enough with OAuth to know if it
makes sense to have a client auth module but surely a server auth
Paul,
I've already added myself to the initial committers. I'll send the fax later
today.
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> If you are considering merging Scribe with Amber I would add yourself to
> the
> initial committers list, and fax in an ICLA to
Hi Pablo,
If you are considering merging Scribe with Amber I would add yourself to the
initial committers list, and fax in an ICLA to get things rolling:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:07 AM, pablo fernandez <
fernandezp
Simone,
Yeah, the library now supports OAuth v1.0a. I intend to add 2.0 support
eventually...
I added myself under "other interested people". I've never participated in
any apache project so I think that's the right place.
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Simone Gianni wrote:
> Hi Pabl
Hi Pablo,
great, thanks for your interest. I suppose you are talking about OAuth v1?
Please have a look at the current proposal on
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AmberProposal and eventually add yourself
where appropriate.
Simone
2010/4/29 pablo fernandez
> Hello Everyone!
>
> I've developed
Hello Everyone!
I've developed a OAuth library for java that it's working pretty well,
although it's still work in progress.
I'd be glad to collaborate the code to Amber, modifying it to the project
needs.
If you want to take a look at it, please go to:
github.com/fernandezpablo85/scribe
On 29/04/2010 10:45, Paul Lindner wrote:
> The Shindig PMC has approved the proposal to sponsor the Amber project for
> the Apache Incubator.
>
> 7 +1 votes were submitted. [Henning, Chirag, Chico, Paul, Jacky, Santiago
> and Vincent]
> No 0 or -1 votes.
That's excellent news! Thanks.
Pid
> O
The Shindig PMC has approved the proposal to sponsor the Amber project for
the Apache Incubator.
7 +1 votes were submitted. [Henning, Chirag, Chico, Paul, Jacky, Santiago
and Vincent]
No 0 or -1 votes.
Thanks
Paul
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose that th
21 matches
Mail list logo