Being on the receiving end of mentorship (Isis), I can say that I've
appreciated having 3 active mentors (Mark Struberg, Benson Marguiles and
Mohammad Nour El-Din)... each has their own things that they are
particularly good at picking up on, and I think we're the better for it.
On a pragmatic not
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Imo it's always good to have a few pair of (active!) eyes having oversight.
>
> It's just simply too easy to miss something important - even for a
> long-time committed mentor.
>
True, it is also important about how they co-ordinate with eac
Imo it's always good to have a few pair of (active!) eyes having oversight.
It's just simply too easy to miss something important - even for a long-time
committed mentor.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Jim Jagielski
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Frid
On 2/3/2012 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> One thing I would like to be bantered about:
>
> Long ago, it was customary to have a single mentor for a podling.
> Nowadays, the feelings are the more, the merrier.
By the same measure, there is a role of Champion. If we can avoid
fracturing that rol
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:07 PM, ant elder wrote:
>... A problem with multiple mentors is that with no single person
> responsible its too easy for no one to do any mentoring because they
> all leave the work for the others to do. The recent change to the
> Champion role (what happened with that?)
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> One thing I would like to be bantered about:
>
> Long ago, it was customary to have a single mentor for a podling.
> Nowadays, the feelings are the more, the merrier.
>
> Has the above been an experiment which succeeded, failed or is moot?
> J
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> ...Long ago, it was customary to have a single mentor for a podling.
> Nowadays, the feelings are the more, the merrier
One *active* mentor is good enough for most podlings, but expecting
the mentor to be always available is not realistic
