Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-28 Thread Mark Struberg
hi just a sidenote: it's always a good idea to use the apache written versions of JSR APIs. You can find them in http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ LieGrue, strub --- On Thu, 4/28/11, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > From: Edward J. Yoon > Subject: Re: [VOTE] R

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-28 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Then, should I open new vote thread? On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your review. I am writing down all advices you gave me on > our project wiki. > > I'll fix that issue and make RC4 soon. > > Thanks. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Seelman

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-28 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Hi, Thanks for your review. I am writing down all advices you gave me on our project wiki. I'll fix that issue and make RC4 soon. Thanks. On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > Hi Edward, > > first sorry for the late response. > > - checksums and signature are ok > - rat-che

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-28 Thread Stefan Seelmann
Hi Edward, first sorry for the late response. - checksums and signature are ok - rat-check looks ok (CHANGES.txt and conf/groomservers are not approved, you should add the apache-rat-plugin to your pom.xml) - Ant and Maven builds worked - license and notice file looks ok except for the servlet.ja

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-22 Thread Edward J. Yoon
We need also one more IPMC binding vote! Sent from my iPhone On 2011. 4. 11., at 오후 4:08, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Hi sebb, > as you noticed, Hama uses Maven as a build system but, since this was added > recently [1][2], the project "main" build is still based on Ant, therefore > Hama still has

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-21 Thread Edward J. Yoon
We need also one more IPMC binding vote! Sent from my iPhone On 2011. 4. 11., at 오후 4:08, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Hi sebb, > as you noticed, Hama uses Maven as a build system but, since this was added > recently [1][2], the project "main" build is still based on Ant, therefore > Hama still has

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-11 Thread Tommaso Teofili
Hi sebb, as you noticed, Hama uses Maven as a build system but, since this was added recently [1][2], the project "main" build is still based on Ant, therefore Hama still has the lib/*.jar versioned in SVN. Thanks for the hints regarding libraries' versions (but I wouldn't consider it a blocker) an

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-10 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Hello, Thanks for your review. BTW, if HAMA-374 is done, we can remove all libraries (including GroboUtils) and ant-build&nightly-build scripts at once. It's scheduled to version 0.3. Since many improvements and new features are planned in next 0.3 version and few patches are already submitted (

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-10 Thread sebb
On 8 April 2011 06:42, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, > > The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer, > and website logo/text) are all fixed and I just created RC3. There'are > only changes of text, no changes at the code level. > > Hama Website

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-10 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Hi all, If you not voted yet, Please vote for Hama 0.2 incubating on below thread. http://s.apache.org/8m4 Thanks. On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, > > The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer, > and website l

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-08 Thread Eric Charles
[x] +1 Release the packages as Apache Hama 0.2-incubating (non-binding) Tks, - Eric > Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, > > The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer, and > website logo/text) are all fixed and I just created RC3. There'are only > changes of text, no