hi just a sidenote: it's always a good idea to use the apache written versions
of JSR APIs. You can find them in
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 4/28/11, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> From: Edward J. Yoon
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] R
Then, should I open new vote thread?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your review. I am writing down all advices you gave me on
> our project wiki.
>
> I'll fix that issue and make RC4 soon.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Seelman
Hi,
Thanks for your review. I am writing down all advices you gave me on
our project wiki.
I'll fix that issue and make RC4 soon.
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>
> first sorry for the late response.
>
> - checksums and signature are ok
> - rat-che
Hi Edward,
first sorry for the late response.
- checksums and signature are ok
- rat-check looks ok (CHANGES.txt and conf/groomservers are not
approved, you should add the apache-rat-plugin to your pom.xml)
- Ant and Maven builds worked
- license and notice file looks ok except for the servlet.ja
We need also one more IPMC binding vote!
Sent from my iPhone
On 2011. 4. 11., at 오후 4:08, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi sebb,
> as you noticed, Hama uses Maven as a build system but, since this was added
> recently [1][2], the project "main" build is still based on Ant, therefore
> Hama still has
We need also one more IPMC binding vote!
Sent from my iPhone
On 2011. 4. 11., at 오후 4:08, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi sebb,
> as you noticed, Hama uses Maven as a build system but, since this was added
> recently [1][2], the project "main" build is still based on Ant, therefore
> Hama still has
Hi sebb,
as you noticed, Hama uses Maven as a build system but, since this was added
recently [1][2], the project "main" build is still based on Ant, therefore
Hama still has the lib/*.jar versioned in SVN.
Thanks for the hints regarding libraries' versions (but I wouldn't
consider it a blocker) an
Hello,
Thanks for your review.
BTW, if HAMA-374 is done, we can remove all libraries (including
GroboUtils) and ant-build&nightly-build scripts at once. It's
scheduled to version 0.3.
Since many improvements and new features are planned in next 0.3
version and few patches are already submitted
(
On 8 April 2011 06:42, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer,
> and website logo/text) are all fixed and I just created RC3. There'are
> only changes of text, no changes at the code level.
>
> Hama Website
Hi all,
If you not voted yet, Please vote for Hama 0.2 incubating on below thread.
http://s.apache.org/8m4
Thanks.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer,
> and website l
[x] +1 Release the packages as Apache Hama 0.2-incubating
(non-binding)
Tks,
- Eric
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer, and
> website logo/text) are all fixed and I just created RC3. There'are only
> changes of text, no
11 matches
Mail list logo