Hello, Thanks for your review.
BTW, if HAMA-374 is done, we can remove all libraries (including GroboUtils) and ant-build&nightly-build scripts at once. It's scheduled to version 0.3. Since many improvements and new features are planned in next 0.3 version and few patches are already submitted (http://s.apache.org/G8n), we'd like to release this '0.2-incubating candidate' as soon as possible. Thanks. On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:58 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 April 2011 06:42, Edward J. Yoon <edwardy...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, >> >> The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer, >> and website logo/text) are all fixed and I just created RC3. There'are >> only changes of text, no changes at the code level. >> >> Hama Website: >> http://incubator.apache.org/hama >> >> The release artifact, sums, GPG key and signature: >> http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.2.0-RC3/ >> >> Subversion tag for release: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.2-RC3/ > > The project appears to be using Maven to build, and declares > dependencies to various libraries. > > So why are the libraries included in SVN in the lib directory? > > This does not make sense - apart perhaps from grobo-testing-junit > which does not appear to have been uploaded to Maven Central yet. > But even that is available from at least one Maven repo, e.g. > https://m2.duraspace.org/content/repositories/public/org/fcrepo/GroboTestingJUnit-core/. > > I just tried "mvn test" against the SVN tag, having removed all but > Grobo from the lib directory, and it compiled and ran fine. > Seems unnecessary and wasteful to store duplicates of the libraries in > SVN and to include them in the archive. > > By the way, commons-httpclient 3.0.1 is very out of date, the latest > 3.x release is 3.1 (which itself is now superseded by the 4.x series), > likewise commons-logging is now at 1.1.1, and you don't normally need > both commons-logging and commons-loggin-api > > JUnit 3.8.1 is also obsolete; for Java 1.6 (which the POM targets) I > would expect to see v4.8.2 > >> Please vote again on this thread! >> >> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache Hama 0.2-incubating >> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... >> >> Thanks in advance!! >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> http://blog.udanax.org >> http://twitter.com/eddieyoon >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon http://blog.udanax.org http://twitter.com/eddieyoon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
