Re: NOTICE and LICENSE [WAS Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2)]

2011-07-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dan Haywood wrote: >> ...Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with >> [2].  If these discussions on legal did occur, then it would seem that >> no-one on the leg

Re: NOTICE and LICENSE [WAS Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2)]

2011-07-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Dan, On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dan Haywood wrote: > ...Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with > [2].  If these discussions on legal did occur, then it would seem that > no-one on the legal team updated [1] to reflect new policy. I think [1] is correct,

Re: NOTICE and LICENSE [WAS Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2)]

2011-07-06 Thread Dan Haywood
On 06/07/2011 11:57, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: (Apologies if I've missed any changes in Apache policy - please jump in and correct me) Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with [2]. If these discussions on legal did occur, then it would seem that no-one on t

NOTICE and LICENSE [WAS Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2)]

2011-07-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Dan Haywood wrote: (Apologies if I've missed any changes in Apache policy - please jump in and correct me) > 1. as I understand it, notices and licenses for 3rd party products should > not go in NOTICE and LICENSE, but should go in DEPENDENCIES.  This can be > g

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2)

2011-07-06 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi Edward... In that case would you please cancel this [VOTE] thread and start a new one. Notice that when producing the RC3 you would have to start a [VOTE] thread on your dev@ first and when passed you start a [VOTE] again here in general@. On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Edward J. Yoon w

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2)

2011-07-06 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Thanks, BTW, if adding CDDL license and notice is enough to release, I'd like to do at the moment. Because we're trying to release monthly, and maven pom can be improved next time. I'm going to upload RC3 again. On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Dan Haywood wrote: > Presumably this means the vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2)

2011-07-06 Thread Dan Haywood
Presumably this means the vote is cancelled, because the ZIP being voted on hasn't been updated? Also... 1. as I understand it, notices and licenses for 3rd party products should not go in NOTICE and LICENSE, but should go in DEPENDENCIES. This can be generated automatically using maven-remot

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2)

2011-07-05 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Hi, Stefan Thanks for your review. I've added CDDLv1.0 license and notice. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.3/NOTICE.txt http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.3/LICENSE.txt Could you please check the files again? Thanks. On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:57

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2)

2011-07-05 Thread Stefan Seelmann
Hi Edward, I found an issue which is a blocker IMO: jsp-2.1-6.1.4.jar and jsp-api-2.1-6.1.4.jar from Jetty are included. To my knowlege they are licensed under CDDL*. This is a "Category B" [4] license so either - add the license [1] and the notice excerp [2] to the Hama LICENSE and NOTICE files o

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2)

2011-07-04 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Please review this release candidate! On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache Hama community voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2). This release contains performance > improvements and new features e.g., maven build,