Cool, thanks Dave!
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> +1
>
> In addition to that JIRA ticket, I also appreciate the clarification earlier
> in
> this email thread about exactly which file is being voted on for release. I
> was
> unsure since there were so many jar files.
+1
In addition to that JIRA ticket, I also appreciate the clarification earlier in
this email thread about exactly which file is being voted on for release. I was
unsure since there were so many jar files. The source zip looks good to me.
On 1/19/14 12:17 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> HI Dave, ju
19 January 2014 19:28
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating
Yep, I'm happy to give a +1 but would still like clarification on
whether this file:
http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/meta
Yep, I'm happy to give a +1 but would still like clarification on
whether this file:
http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip
... Is *the* file we're voting on. The email
Sounds good to me Marvin.
I agree mentors votes are the ones should count most. I just want to make
sure no -1 VOTE from IPMCs about this RC.
- Henry
On Sunday, January 19, 2014, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Henry Saputra
> >
> wrote:
> > I assume we will get +1 f
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> I assume we will get +1 from you for this release candidate given
> Kasper's new JIRA task filed?
My freelance vote is not needed, and I'm not going to set a precedent
where Mentors don't have to vote because they can count on people like
me
HI Dave, just want to clarify if any concern or issue you raised
should block the RC or could we get +1 from you given the new JIRA
Kasper filed to fix the LICENSE?
- Henry
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> Hi Ankit and other Metamodel developers,
>
> Congrats on getting t
I assume we will get +1 from you for this release candidate given
Kasper's new JIRA task filed?
- Henry
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Kasper Sørensen
> wrote:
>
>> I've made a task for the additional licenses in the LICENSE file that
Noah, can we address these with next release or do you think should
block the release?
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Just to be clear, is this the single release artefact we're voting on:
>
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/ap
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Kasper Sørensen
wrote:
> I've made a task for the additional licenses in the LICENSE file that you
> mention: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-34
>
> Do tell if this task is somehow not sufficient to mend the issue that you
> identified.
Looks go
asper
From: Marvin Humphrey [mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: 15 January 2014 18:14
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Do you think it is a blocker for the release for the NOTICE fi
Apache Software Foundation.
From: Marvin Humphrey [mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: 15 January 2014 18:14
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
>
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 4.0.0 incubating
I think DEPENDENCIES are generated by Maven.
Hmm I am not sure about HEADER.txt, we'll bring the discussion back to
MetaModel podling dev for another round.
- Henry
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Noah Slater
HI Marvin,
As usual, thanks for the useful review.
We will revise the LICENSE and NOTICE files in MetaModel podling dev
list and come back for VOTE.
- Henry
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>> Do you think it
I think DEPENDENCIES are generated by Maven.
Hmm I am not sure about HEADER.txt, we'll bring the discussion back to
MetaModel podling dev for another round.
- Henry
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Just to be clear, is this the single release artefact we're voting on:
>
>
Just to be clear, is this the single release artefact we're voting on:
http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip
Is it common to have asc.md5 and asc.sha1? They seem redund
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Do you think it is a blocker for the release for the NOTICE file extra
> lines of information?
In the NOTICE file in the release candidate, the last three lines with content
are...
Portions of this software were originally based on the
Thanks for the input Dave, really useful.
Do you think it is a blocker for the release for the NOTICE file extra
lines of information?
The NOTICE file in source jar should be the same with the one from git
repo. Could you tell me which NOTICE file in the source jar you were
referring to?
- Henry
Hi Ankit and other Metamodel developers,
Congrats on getting this far with your first release so far. Here's a few
questions and concerns:
The NOTICE file should only have what's needed. In your git repo, the last 3
lines I don't think should be there. The NOTICE file in the source jar files
l
19 matches
Mail list logo
