Thanks Justin, we will also double check and update any other stuff in
further releases.
Thanks again.
Luke
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate?
>
> You can
Thanks Justin and everyone! I will send out the vote result soon;
2015-10-23 13:38 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean :
> Hi,
>
> > Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate?
>
> You can release it without me changing my vote, there are no veto on
> releases.
>
> But as you asked and it's
Hi,
> Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate?
You can release it without me changing my vote, there are no veto on releases.
But as you asked and it's been dealt with my vote is +1 (binding).
Thanks,
Justin
--
Thanks Justin,
Will raise another thread to continue discuss this.
Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate?
Thanks.
发自我的 iPhone
> 在 2015年10月23日，12:56，Justin Mclean 写道：
>
> Hi,
>
>> So my question is: Which license should to be declare in downstream of
>> Google Fonts?
>
Hi,
> So my question is: Which license should to be declare in downstream of
> Google Fonts?
INAL you may want to ask for clarification on legal discuss.
I would go with what is in the metadata of the font file as it usually contains
the copyright holder and the licensing information, but I’d
Hi Justin,
JIRA has been reopened and added information about license.
Also added Google Fonts and Source Sans Pro license information
in Apache Kylin's LICENSE file.
It looks like Google Fonts included Source Sans Pro, and has it's
own license agreement, suppose Google has
HI,
> You need to update the LICENSE file for Kylin to include the one for AdminLTE.
The files in question are not part of AdminLTE [1] that I can see. Even if
they were they would have different copyright owners and a different LICENCE to
AdminLTE. An educated guess is that they are the Sourc
Jason,
You need to update the LICENSE file for Kylin to include the one for AdminLTE.
I will reopen the JIRA to reflect this.
- Henry
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> But this should not a block issue for release.
>
> My +0 doesn’t block the release, you only ne
Hi,
> But this should not a block issue for release.
My +0 doesn’t block the release, you only need 3 +1 votes.
Normally I would of asked to fix in next release and probably voted +1 as it’s
likely they are Apache comparable licences, but this issue has occurred before
and there's a vote on gr
Thanks Jason to check these.We should add in notice/disclaim files about
this(AdminLTE already be mentioned there)
But this should not a block issue for release.
Hi Justin, would you mind to check and vote again?
Thank you very much.
Regards!
Luke Han
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:29 PM -0700, "J
Hi all,
about the font license
Kylin UI is build with AdminLTE[1]
AdminLTE license here[2]
AdminLTE use google webfonts, you can see it at first line here[3]
due to firewall issue,some places like CHINA may not be able to access
this file.so we download it to local file
"webapp/app/fonts/A
Hi,
It’s +0 (binding) from me.
I checked:
- release name includes incubating
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is OK, but probably missing font license
- NOTICE all good
- All source files have apache headers (a few test files and data files don’t)
- A couple of unexpe
+1 (binding)
Checked sigs license headers, NOTICE, LICENSE, etc. All look good.
-Taylor
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 9:42 PM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating.
>
> Proposal:http://s.apache
Hi IPMC,
We would like to have more vote from IPMC members to help on this
release candidate.
Thank you very much.
Luke
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Signature file look good
> Hash files look good
> LICENSE a
Signature file look good
Hash files look good
LICENSE and DISCLAIMER exist
No 3rd party exes found in source artifacts
+1 (binding)
- Henry
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:42 PM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Kyli
+1
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 7:40 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> Forwarding my vote from the dev list:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>> On Oct 19, 2015, at 1:18 AM, 周千昊 wrote:
>>
>> +1
>> mvn test passed
>>
>> hongbin ma 于2015年10月19日周一 上午11:28写道：
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> unit test passed on my CI
>>>
On Mon,
Forwarding my vote from the dev list:
+1 (binding)
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 1:18 AM, 周千昊 wrote:
>
> +1
> mvn test passed
>
> hongbin ma 于2015年10月19日周一 上午11:28写道：
>
>> +1
>>
>> unit test passed on my CI
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Li Yang wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Checksum is corr
+1
mvn test passed
hongbin ma 于2015年10月19日周一 上午11:28写道：
> +1
>
> unit test passed on my CI
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Li Yang wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Checksum is correct.
> >
> > Unit test passed on java version "1.7.0_71", OpenJDK Runtime Environment
> > (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-x86_64 u71-
+1
unit test passed on my CI
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Li Yang wrote:
> +1
>
> Checksum is correct.
>
> Unit test passed on java version "1.7.0_71", OpenJDK Runtime Environment
> (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-x86_64 u71-b14)
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Luke Han wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
+1
Checksum is correct.
Unit test passed on java version "1.7.0_71", OpenJDK Runtime Environment
(rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-x86_64 u71-b14)
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Luke Han wrote:
> +1
>
> MD5 & SHA1 checksum verified
> License files are all there
>
> Unit Test passed
>
>
>
> Best Regards!
>
+1
MD5 & SHA1 checksum verified
License files are all there
Unit Test passed
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:42 AM, ShaoFeng Shi
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Kylin 1.1-incubat
21 matches
Mail list logo
