Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-13 Thread Mike Beckerle
Hi all, The vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2 is now closed. Thanks to those that took the time to review and vote. The release has passed with 3 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding: [List of +1 Voters] Christofer Dutz Justin Mclean Dave Fisher Vote threads: (

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-13 Thread Dave Fisher
+1 (binding) NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER are good. Checksums and signatures are good. Incubating in name. 3 of the 4 binary artifacts are equivalent aside from shell script in rpm. Did not unpack the msi so can’t vouch for that content. (I don’t have windows) sbt ratCheck is good. Compiles and

Re: [RELEASENOTES?] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-13 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Dave, they are not a requirement ... it's just that every project I'm on sort of has them and I think it's a good thing to have them. I didn't vote -1 or so ... I just added a comment as a minor issue (in my opinion) Chris Am 13.07.20, 16:53 schrieb "Dave Fisher" : > On Jul 10, 20

[RELEASENOTES?] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-13 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:43 AM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I did find some minor issues though, please see below. > I would really suggest to start maintaining a RELEASE_NOTES file. I usually > have a look at this in order to see what to expect of the new release. > > Ch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-13 Thread Dave Fisher
Mentors are volunteers. Daffodil has only two mentors. For a long time it was a single mentor. Anyone interested in mentoring Daffodil? The only issue preventing graduation is lack of diversity. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 13, 2020, at 7:25 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-13 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > Hoping we can get someone else to review soon. Your mentors should be voting on your releases as they are IPMC members. If they are not please remind them to do so. If your mentors are absent then please ask for someone to replace them. Thanks Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-11 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating n name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary file. However some test files end in “.bin” it would be good to rename these. - All ASF files have ASF headers - Can compile from source Than

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-10 Thread Christofer Dutz
+1 (binding) I did find some minor issues though, please see below. I would really suggest to start maintaining a RELEASE_NOTES file. I usually have a look at this in order to see what to expect of the new release. Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

2020-07-09 Thread Beckerle, Mike
Hoping to get some attention to this. We have a user community that requested that we do this point-release with a specific fix. This is gating their release of a system that uses Daffodil. Please review this latest incubator release of Daffodil. Thank you Fro