Hi Dave,
they are not a requirement ... it's just that every project I'm on sort of has
them and I think it's a good thing to have them.
I didn't vote -1 or so ... I just added a comment as a minor issue (in my
opinion)
Chris
Am 13.07.20, 16:53 schrieb "Dave Fisher" <w...@apache.org>:
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:43 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I did find some minor issues though, please see below.
> I would really suggest to start maintaining a RELEASE_NOTES file. I
usually have a look at this in order to see what to expect of the new release.
>
> Chris
>
>
> [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release
vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir.
> [MINOR] Verify the signature is correct: Additional Apache tutorial on
how to verify downloads can be found here.
> - No trusted Key-chain (might think about going to a key-signing party)
> [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address.
> [OK] Verify the SHA512 hashes:
> [OK] Unzip the archive:
> [MINOR] Verify the existence of DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE, README,
RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle.
> - No RELEASE_NOTES
When and where did Release Notes become a requirement?
They may be a good idea, but I want a reference to where this requirement
came about and who made that change.
Regards,
Dave
> [OK] Verify the content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files
in the extracted source bundle.
> [OK] Run RAT externally (without any exclusions) to ensure there are no
surprises.
> [OK] Search for SNAPSHOT references:
> [MINOR] Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make
sure these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file.
> - Some files listed in LICENSE moved from
daffodil-test/src/test/resources/org/apache/daffodil/ibm-tests/ to
daffodil-test-ibm1/src/test/resources/test-suite/ibm-contributed/ without being
updated in the LICENSE file
> - dpaspc7131.dfdl.xsd
> - dpaspc7132.dfdl.xsd
> - dpaspc7132_2.dfdl.xsd
> [OK] Build the project according to the information in the README.md file.
>
>
>
>
> Am 10.07.20, 03:38 schrieb "Beckerle, Mike" <mbecke...@tresys.com>:
>
>
> Hoping to get some attention to this.
>
> We have a user community that requested that we do this point-release
with a specific fix.
> This is gating their release of a system that uses Daffodil.
>
> Please review this latest incubator release of Daffodil.
>
> Thank you
>
> ________________________________
> From: Mike Beckerle <mbecke...@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 11:45 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org <general@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2
>
> The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed
> release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2.
>
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release.
>
> Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification
that
> uses DFDL schemas to parse fixed format data into an infoset, which is
most
> commonly represented as either XML or JSON. This allows the use of
> well-established XML or JSON technologies and libraries to consume,
> inspect, and manipulate fixed format data in existing solutions.
Daffodil
> is also capable of the reverse by serializing or "unparsing" an XML or
JSON
> infoset back to the original data format.
>
> Vote thread:
>
>
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/daffodil-dev/202007.mbox/%3CEEA6E9860DFB8449AA9F0E561E1B75AAA9709778%40ALPMBAPA07.e2k.ad.ge.com%3E
>
> Result thread:
>
>
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/daffodil-dev/202007.mbox/%3CCAM5OWnjr88hP-DVqFh2hKFBMMXepKu39YEt-_E-8Agx2%3DHBOcA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.7.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1018/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 13A680AF, corresponding
> to mbecke...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.7.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.7.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.7.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.7.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (ends on Thursday July 9 at 12 noon US.EDT = UTC-4)
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
