On 7/18/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel,
> Cliff is driving the pmc selection/vp recommendation process.
>
> Cliff,
> Could you please respond?
Sure -- I'll follow up my earlier thread on the beehive ppmc list re:
board resolution and VP candidate.
Cliff
>
> thanks,
> di
Noel,
Cliff is driving the pmc selection/vp recommendation process.
Cliff,
Could you please respond?
thanks,
dims
On 7/18/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dims,
>
> It appears that there are sufficient votes and no objections. Please
> prepare a request to be submitted to the
Dims,
It appears that there are sufficient votes and no objections. Please
prepare a request to be submitted to the Board meeting, which will be next
week.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
I believe Beehive is ready to function as a standalone PMC. Please see
the latest status at:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html
+1
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 05:01 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > Discussions regarding the Web Security situation on legal-discuss have
> > revealed that IBM have provided a "patent license" to Apache for this
> > particular project. However, in the opinions of at least one lawyer,
> > any
> > deriva
And, I'm updating the web page now.
Kenneth Tam wrote:
I'll follow up separately with Cliff to see whether a CLA ever
actually made it to Apache, but in any case he has been inactive since
day 1 and should be removed.
On 7/15/05, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 12, 2005
I'll follow up separately with Cliff to see whether a CLA ever
actually made it to Apache, but in any case he has been inactive since
day 1 and should be removed.
On 7/15/05, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > Dear Incubator PMC
On Jul 15, 2005, at 5:51 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Great!!! So we can make a release of WSS4J and get the code from TSIK.
Right?
AFAIK, yes. +1 from me.
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Great!!! So we can make a release of WSS4J and get the code from TSIK. Right?
-- dims
On 7/15/05, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2005, at 5:06 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > All public knowledge about about WS-Security are just "claims"[1]. No
> > one has given us OR
On Jul 15, 2005, at 5:06 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
All public knowledge about about WS-Security are just "claims"[1]. No
one has given us OR made any public statement of specific patents
(from BM/MSFT/Versign) that are applicable to WS-Security.
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wss/
This is news to me follow up question on legal-discuss@ Let's
please take this conversation there where it belongs.
-- dims
On 7/15/05, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> blanket reciprocal patent license
--
Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
Simon,
This is not the right forum, we should move this to legal-discuss. i
will answer here since we are still treating TSIK under incubation.
All public knowledge about about WS-Security are just "claims"[1]. No
one has given us OR made any public statement of specific patents
(from BM/MSFT/Ver
On Jul 15, 2005, at 4:03 AM, Simon Kitching wrote:
I am concerned about:
* Situations like the Web Security project, where the OASIS
specification being implemented by Apache explicitly states that there
are patents claimed over the specification.
Then go look at the source of the specificatio
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 03:19 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2005, at 3:51 PM, Simon Kitching wrote:
> > Could someone please provide information on any patents known to apply
> > to this project?
>
> No, damnit. That is not how patents work! If we are notified of a
> patent owned by so
On Jul 12, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Dear Incubator PMC,
I believe Beehive is ready to function as a standalone PMC. Please see
the latest status at:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html
What's the deal with the one committer without a CLA? Either
his CLA and acc
On Jul 14, 2005, at 3:51 PM, Simon Kitching wrote:
Could someone please provide information on any patents known to apply
to this project?
No, damnit. That is not how patents work! If we are notified of a
patent owned by some entity that has not signed a CLA and contributed
the code, then and
On Jul 14, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Simon Kitching wrote:
Yes the current discussion on legal-discuss is wrt wss4j, but the
question for beehive was more general: are there any patents that have
been explicitly granted for the use of Beehive?
This is not how the question should be asked. The questio
Yes the current discussion on legal-discuss is wrt wss4j, but the
question for beehive was more general: are there any patents that have
been explicitly granted for the use of Beehive? For example, have BEA
issued any "licenses" to Apache with respect to stuff that Beehive
implements?
Regards,
Si
Beehive doesn't currently have any implementations of the WS-*
standards, including WS-Security -- the intent was to at some point
look to other Apache projects that were implementing those standards
(I don't subscribe to legal-discuss, but I presume the discussion in
question is wrt WSS4J?).
On 7
> On 7/12/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Incubator PMC,
> >
> > I believe Beehive is ready to function as a standalone PMC. Please
> see
> > the latest status at:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html
Could someone please provide information on any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/12/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Incubator PMC,
>
> I believe Beehive is ready to function as a standalone PMC. Please
see
> the latest status at:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html
+1
- - The Beehiv
Didn't mean to fill everyone's inbox with this message, although I *am*
excited for Beehive to be a fully-integrated part of the Apache
community. Apologies for that spam (and this spam).
Rich
Rich Feit wrote:
Thank you, Craig! We're really looking forward to being part of the
wider Apache
Thank you, Craig! We're really looking forward to being part of the
wider Apache community.
At some point I'd love for us to figure out how page flows and Shale
constructs can play nicely with each other.
Rich
Craig McClanahan wrote:
+1 (Incubator Project Mentor)
The Beehive folks have c
+1 (Incubator Project Mentor)
The Beehive folks have clearly shown they understand "the Apache Way",
and they actually behave that way too. All the necessary i's have
been dotted and the t's have been crossed, and this will be a great
Apache TLP.
Craig McClanahan
On 7/12/05, Davanum Srinivas <
Yeah! Yeah! would you guys please vote instead of nit-picking? :)
-- dims
On 7/13/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's really important distinction ;)
>
> On Jul 13, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > Sorry.
> >
> > On 7/12/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It's really important distinction ;)
On Jul 13, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sorry.
On 7/12/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 05:38, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
PS: once we get this VOTE done, cliff/me will work with the ppmc on
forming the PM
Sorry.
On 7/12/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 July 2005 05:38, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > PS: once we get this VOTE done, cliff/me will work with the ppmc on
> > forming the PMC and selecting the VP.
>
> Tiny correction. VP is not selected, it is recommended to
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 05:38, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> PS: once we get this VOTE done, cliff/me will work with the ppmc on
> forming the PMC and selecting the VP.
Tiny correction. VP is not selected, it is recommended to the Board.
Cheers
Niclas
--
28 matches
Mail list logo
