Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote on Monday, June 14, 2004 11:46 PM:
> > Understanding that "BEA has absolutely no intention of dropping
> > support of the XMLBeans project", do you feel that XMLBeans is ready
> > to leave the Incubator, or would it benefit from further stay?
> I think
Noel J. Bergman wrote on Monday, June 14, 2004 11:46 PM:
>> 6 BEA-employed committers + 5 independent committers
>
>> I think there is definitely sufficient community interest to keep the
>> project going; however, it would probably move a lot slower if BEA
>> were to drop XMLBeans today.
>
> Un
On 14 Jun 2004, at 23:07, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see one or two quantitative rules (such as one
about independent committers to allow for vetoes)
IMHO, that would be a requirement for projects prior to *entering* the
incubator.
--
Steven Noelshtt
> 6 BEA-employed committers + 5 independent committers
> I think there is definitely sufficient community interest to keep the
> project going; however, it would probably move a lot slower if BEA
> were to drop XMLBeans today.
Understanding that "BEA has absolutely no intention of dropping suppor
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> I think the problem we are faced with is determining how to define
> a "healthy community" when used as a criterion for exiting the
> incubator.
I'm perfectly comfortable with adopting Justice Stewart's famous comment
when it comes to defining a healthy ASF community, rathe
Personally, I'd like to see one or two quantitative rules (such as one
about independent committers to allow for vetoes) and then leave the
rest
up to a voting body that will evaluate graduation against some general
guidelines. I also think the voting body should be the PPMC, which is
made up of
Noel J. Bergman wrote on Monday, June 14, 2004 12:14 PM:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> Leo Simons wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> I have no idea where that 50% stuff came from.
me neither! But I figure it was added for /some/ reason :-D
>>>
>>> IMO, ther
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > > > I have no idea where that 50% stuff came from.
> > >
> > > me neither! But I figure it was added for /some/ reason :-D
> >
> > IMO, there ought to be a sufficient independent community such that
On Jun 13, 2004, at 7:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote on Friday, June 11, 2004 2:24 PM:
I have no idea where that 50% stuff came from.
me neither! But I figure it was added for /some/ reason :-D
hmm. Do you have an opinion?
IMO, there ought to be a sufficient
Noel J. Bergman wrote on Sunday, June 13, 2004 4:31 PM:
> Cliff Schmidt wrote:
>> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>> Leo Simons wrote:
[is the rule that a project just needs 3 independent committers, or
is there an additional rule that no more than 50% of the committers
must be part of a si
Leo Simons wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote on Friday, June 11, 2004 2:24 PM:
>>I have no idea where that 50% stuff came from.
> me neither! But I figure it was added for /some/ reason :-D
> hmm. Do you have an opinion?
IMO, there ought to be a sufficient independent community such that if
commerci
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > [is the rule that a project just needs 3 independent committers, or
> > > is there an additional rule that no more than 50% of the committers
> > > must be part of a single company?]
> > >
> > > IIRC that 50% rule applies, bu
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote on Friday, June 11, 2004 2:24 PM:
On Friday, June 11, 2004, at 04:01 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
[is the rule that a project just needs 3 independent committers, or
is there an additional rule that no more than 50% of the committers
must be part of a single com
Roy T. Fielding wrote on Friday, June 11, 2004 2:24 PM:
> On Friday, June 11, 2004, at 04:01 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
>
>> [is the rule that a project just needs 3 independent committers, or
>> is there an additional rule that no more than 50% of the committers
>> must be part of a single company?]
14 matches
Mail list logo
