Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-07 Thread Craig L Russell
al Message- From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 7 August 2006 4:41 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator) given the amount of upset caused by names, i think that we should appoint

RE: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-07 Thread Gav....
> -Original Message- > From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 7 August 2006 4:41 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator) > > given the amount of upset cau

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-06 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On 8/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. hmm...sounds like we should have some docs that

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-06 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 8/5/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. +1 I can imagine how frustrating this must be

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-04 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. I can imagine how frustrating this must be to folks who are new to Apache, but folks here don't like private

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Martin- yes we solved it recently. But... the process of solving that is not quite clear. I created an issue / task in JIRA for that. I am only refering to the trademark issue; the rest was pretty easy, the community voted on the name. We only ensured that no names with *potential* trademark tro

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-04 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Also if I recall correctly, naming issues can also be solved while in the incbuator... (like adffaces has) Mvgr, Martin Danny Angus wrote: Archit, I'm very happy to here you say so, I certainly don't want to affect your progress through the incubator, in many ways I've unfairly sigled you out

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-04 Thread Danny Angus
Archit, I'm very happy to here you say so, I certainly don't want to affect your progress through the incubator, in many ways I've unfairly sigled you out as an example of a prectice I feel strongly about. Unfortunately I will be away, offline, for the next four days, but if it is still relevant