Re: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-31 Thread Brian McCallister
Correct, Jeremy is the only non-IBM committer. -Brian On Mar 30, 2005, at 10:28 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Cliff Schmidt wrote: Doesn't Derby have at least three independent committers? There's Jeremy and the IBM folks...who's the other one? As far as I know, Jeremy is the only non-IBM Committer to

RE: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-30 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Cliff Schmidt wrote: > Doesn't Derby have at least three independent committers? > There's Jeremy and the IBM folks...who's the other one? As far as I know, Jeremy is the only non-IBM Committer to Derby. --- Noel - To u

Re: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-30 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:44:40 -0500, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cliff Schmidt wrote: > > the committer diversity issue has been raised as an issue by > > at least a couple folks. While it looks like they meet the > > requirement to have committers from at least three independent >

RE: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Cliff Schmidt wrote: > the committer diversity issue has been raised as an issue by > at least a couple folks. While it looks like they meet the > requirement to have committers from at least three independent > organizations (I believe Noel and Jeremy are the two who are > independent from IBM)

Re: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-28 Thread Roy T . Fielding
There are more important issues with graduation as Roy just pointed out with his veto. I think once these technicalities are settled this project is ready. Er, just a vote -- there is no veto for this type of decision. I will change my vote to +1 as soon as the documentation is fixed. Roy --

Re: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-28 Thread Alex Karasulu
Cliff Schmidt wrote: It sounds like people involved with the project are happy with the user community and the process being followed by the Derby committers, and it's great they've added a committer since starting Incubation. However, the committer diversity issue has been raised as an issue by at

Re: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Cliff Schmidt wrote: It sounds like people involved with the project are happy with the user community and the process being followed by the Derby committers, and it's great they've added a committer since starting Incubation. However, the committer diversity issue has been raised as an issue by at

Re: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-28 Thread Cliff Schmidt
It sounds like people involved with the project are happy with the user community and the process being followed by the Derby committers, and it's great they've added a committer since starting Incubation. However, the committer diversity issue has been raised as an issue by at least a couple folk

Re: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-27 Thread Alex Karasulu
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: I'd like to open the discussion about Derby graduating from the incubator. The project has accomplished all of its stated goals save for the acquisition of several additional committers. I attest that the project is being operated according to the Apache guidelines an

Re: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-16 Thread Jeremy Boynes
As that one committer I am also comfortable discussing this. The user community is growing continuously and is very diverse. The developer community, while not as diverse as we would like, has demonstrated that it is following its charter (found at http://incubator.apache.org/derby/ ), is operat

Re: Prepping for Derby graduation vote

2005-03-16 Thread Brian McCallister
DB PMC Hat On: I'm quite comfortable discussing this. One committer has been added while in incubation, and there are a couple more people under consideration. The user and developer community has grown, even if the committer distribution is worrisome. Very much worth talking about, though! -Br