Article on JAXP 1.3 [Re: xml-commons upgradation to JAXP 1.3 complete [Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache]]

Hello All, Sometimes back i wrote an article on JAXP 1.3 which explains the new concepts and important features introduced in JAXP 1.3 Especially the new - Schema Validation Framework - Object model neutral XPath APIs - XML Schema Datatypes etc. Advantages of New Schema Validation Framework and h

Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 [Re: xml-commons upgradation to JAXP 1.3 complete [Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache]]

Neeraj, Spotted a few typos: XPathFactory factory = XpathFactory.newInstnace(); XPathFactory factory = XpathFactory.newInstance(object_model_uri); Should be: XPathFactory factory = XPathFactory.newInstance(); XPathFactory factory = XPathFactory.newInstance(object_model_uri); Right? -- dims On

xml-commons upgradation to JAXP 1.3 complete [Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache]

Hello All, xml-commons has been upgraded to JAXP 1.3 APIs. If anyone could try and confirm that would be great. - Neeraj Neeraj Bajaj wrote: I tagged xml-commons module yesterday with tag name '*before-jaxp13-upgradation*'. I plan to do the following but i will wait till tomorrow so as to give c

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

I tagged xml-commons module yesterday with tag name '*before-jaxp13-upgradation*'. I plan to do the following but i will wait till tomorrow so as to give chance to the community to correct me if i am doing something wrong. * update javax.xml.*, org.xml.sax*, org.w3c.dom.* sources under xml-com

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Ok, So i will add it and upload again. - Neeraj Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Michael Glavassevich wrote: Hi Neeraj, I noticed that the JAXP 1.3 source files in jsr-206-src.zip have no license on them. The JAXP 1.2 sources in xml-commons carry the Apache license. Will this

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Geir, I have uploaded sources at the same location (xml-commons/contrib/jaxp13) with Apache 2.0 license on every source file. - Neeraj Neeraj Bajaj wrote: Ok, So i will add it and upload again. - Neeraj Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Michael Glavassevich wrote: Hi Neeraj,

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Michael Glavassevich wrote: Hi Neeraj, I noticed that the JAXP 1.3 source files in jsr-206-src.zip have no license on them. The JAXP 1.2 sources in xml-commons carry the Apache license. Will this still be the case for JAXP 1.3? yes - these files must be available under

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Hi Neeraj, I noticed that the JAXP 1.3 source files in jsr-206-src.zip have no license on them. The JAXP 1.2 sources in xml-commons carry the Apache license. Will this still be the case for JAXP 1.3? Thanks. Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/05/2005 06:48:30 AM: > Ok I just finishe

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Ok I just finished uploading JAXP 1.3 sources in "*xml-commons/contrib/jaxp13"* directory. There are 3 files, jsr-206-src.zip, xml-xerces.zip, xalan-src.zip which corresponds to jaxp-api, xerces & xalan sources respectively. - Neeraj Neeraj Bajaj wrote: That really sounds good to me.. so i would

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

[EMAIL PROTECTED], xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org, Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, general@incubator.apache.org, general@xml.apache.org, Janet Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Suttor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

That really sounds good to me.. so i would try to finish it today. I will send mail to the community when i am done. Thanks dims for the suggestion. - Neeraj Davanum Srinivas wrote: Neeraj, my 2 cents...upload the whole thing say in xml-commons/contrib/jaxp13 cvs so everyone can take a look (and th

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Neeraj, my 2 cents...upload the whole thing say in xml-commons/contrib/jaxp13 cvs so everyone can take a look (and then pick on the bits they want/need)...yes, changes to xml-commons can be made ASAP (after tagging the current code in the main trunk there) and it's upto the xml xerces/xalan folks

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Thanks Michael for your response. I was just wondering what would be idle time to wait before i start work on this ? Does anyone has an opinion, Is there any other list where i should send this mail before making changes ? - Neeraj Michael Glavassevich wrote: Hi Neeraj, +1 to putting the JAXP 1.

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Hi Neeraj, +1 to putting the JAXP 1.3 sources on the main trunk, tagging it and making a branch for the old JAXP sources on the current main trunk. There exists a branch called tck-jaxp-1_2_0 where fixes and other updates have been applied to the JAXP 1.2 sources. This is the branch we've used

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Hello All, I sent the mail below with JAXP 1.3 APIs source code attached as zip but mail bounced back with the following message - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - (reason: 552 ZIP attachments are not accepted here.) What should i do now ? Is there a way to upload s

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: Excellent news! Thank to Sun folk and Geir for picking up the ball on this one. Note: once the papers are in the Hallowed Halls, I presume that Neeraj will get some consensus from xml-commons, xalan-dev, and xerces-j

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Thanks. It is good to see this issue moving forward. - eduard/o Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Neeraj Bajaj wrote: xml-common, xerces & xalan communities, I have learnt that legal issues regarding donation has been resolved and latest version of CCLA has been sign

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: Excellent news! Thank to Sun folk and Geir for picking up the ball on this one. Note: once the papers are in the Hallowed Halls, I presume that Neeraj will get some consensus from xml-commons, xalan-dev, and xerces-j-dev as to how to actually

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Excellent news! Thank to Sun folk and Geir for picking up the ball on this one. Note: once the papers are in the Hallowed Halls, I presume that Neeraj will get some consensus from xml-commons, xalan-dev, and xerces-j-dev as to how to actually check this in? I'm presuming you have someone with

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

d to xerces-j-dev To "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc general@incubator.apache.org, Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Suttor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, general@xml.apache.org, xalan-dev@xml.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], xerces-j-

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Neeraj Bajaj wrote: xml-common, xerces & xalan communities, I have learnt that legal issues regarding donation has been resolved and latest version of CCLA has been signed. So would like to make the actual code grant of JAXP 1.3 APIs + implementation ASAP. I will sta

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

xml-common, xerces & xalan communities, I have learnt that legal issues regarding donation has been resolved and latest version of CCLA has been signed. So would like to make the actual code grant of JAXP 1.3 APIs + implementation ASAP. I will start the preparation today and will be back with act

Re: Percentage of projects using Subversion was Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Oct 19, 2004, at 12:04 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:01 PM -0700 Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm happy w/ svn. I really wish I had some minimal support in IDEA, but "svn stat" and "svn move" make up for it :) Hate t

Re: Percentage of projects using Subversion was Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

El mar, 19-10-2004 a las 11:40 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz escribiÃ: > --On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:56 PM -0400 Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have > > migrated to SVN so far? There would be a significantly higher am

Re: Percentage of projects using Subversion was Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:40:47 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:56 PM -0400 Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have > > migrated to SVN so far? There would be a significa

Re: Percentage of projects using Subversion was Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

--On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:01 PM -0700 Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm happy w/ svn. I really wish I had some minimal support in IDEA, but "svn stat" and "svn move" make up for it :) HTH. -- justin --

Re: Percentage of projects using Subversion was Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Oct 19, 2004, at 11:40 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:56 PM -0400 Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have migrated to SVN so far? There would be a significantly higher amount of churn caused to

Percentage of projects using Subversion was Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

--On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:56 PM -0400 Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have migrated to SVN so far? There would be a significantly higher amount of churn caused to the community by an SVN migration than was caused by our

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Wednesday 20 October 2004 01:56, Neil Graham wrote: > I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have > migrated to SVN so far? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ Is the current complete set of projects migrated, some larger than others. Niclas -- +--//

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Hi David, > > So would this be an appropriate time to move the > xml-commons repository to SVN? Well, I don't know about you, but I generally prefer to ease my way into new software tools, rather than dive right into advanced usage. So, speaking for myself, I'd prefer to wait for a period of

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Oct 19, 2004, at 1:40 AM, Neeraj Bajaj wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: This is an update to the existing code that is already there. It is, I suppose, a new grant of software to an existing community, so I think that what we need is the grant documentation from Sun*, have that entered int

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I worked on the some of the legal aspects with Eduardo, so going to jump in here. On Oct 13, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Berin Lautenbach wrote: Neeraj Bajaj wrote: Hello All, I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging the code in branch/review/te

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Neeraj Bajaj wrote: > > I checked on this one, This work involves legal and is being worked with > legal now. > I guess this process would take some time so wanted to update the > community about the status. So would this be an appropriate time to move the xml-commons repository to SVN? -- Da

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Hi all, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/13/2004 06:59:22 PM: > I'm assuming that this is something that XML-Commons/Xerces/Xalan wish > to do? Here's a +1 from someone who's committed to Xerces-J and xml-commons. If either project didn't want to move up to the latest standa

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

David Crossley wrote: One thing that we must have this time around, is a version number on the xml-apis.jar filename. [1] I suppose that is an Xml-commons "build" issue. By the way, that build system is seriously in need of improvement, This is something i can work with you when upgrading to JAX

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Berin Lautenbach wrote: Neeraj Bajaj wrote: Hello All, I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk would take time so at least from my side i would like to see this work started as early as possible say from

RE: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Berin, Judging from yours, Geir's and David's messages, this sounds like mostly a matter of clearing the IP (use the template), but is otherwise eagerly awaited by a community already working with its precursor. As for where it goes, I think that can be left to the community working with the code

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

(I notice that some individuals got dropped from the original posting. Are they on the *.apache mailing lists?) Neeraj Bajaj wrote: > Hello All, > > I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging > the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk > would take

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

I worked on the some of the legal aspects with Eduardo, so going to jump in here. On Oct 13, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Berin Lautenbach wrote: Neeraj Bajaj wrote: Hello All, I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main tr

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Neeraj Bajaj wrote: Hello All, I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk would take time so at least from my side i would like to see this work started as early as possible say from tomorrow. What is the ge