RE: Castle proposal

2004-10-22 Thread Noel J. Bergman
hammett wrote: > if we should have a strong community to enter incubator, > then we will have to wait a few months :-( As much as I'd like to see us able to facilitate community growth within the Incubator, given the limited human resources available, particularly it seems these days, there are g

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-20 Thread hammett
t a few months :-( Cheers, hammett - Original Message - From: "Cliff Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 7:07 PM Subject: RE: Castle proposal Sorry for the late reply. I thought it was more appropriate to reply to this threa

RE: Castle proposal

2004-10-19 Thread Cliff Schmidt
Sorry for the late reply. I thought it was more appropriate to reply to this thread rather than the [VOTE] thread if I was primarily asking a question/voicing a concern... >From the proposal and a quick look at the SF sites, I get the impression that there isn't much of a community behind this

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-03 Thread Leo Simons
hammett wrote: Is there any more things I need to do to start the process? We could wait a few more days for some more feedback and proposal changes (maybe people like William and Brian want to add their name to the committer list?), or you guys could finalize the proposal and we start an Incuba

RE: Castle proposal

2004-10-03 Thread Noel J. Bergman
hammett wrote: > Is there any more things I need to do to start the process? Anything > related to licenses, code IP, CLAs or something like that? I'm kind > of lost here :-) Don't sweat it. Those are some of the things that your Mentor can help with. You have a CLA. You will want to make sure

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-03 Thread hammett
Hiya, - Original Message - From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > being a C#|CLR|.Net project, I anticipate there'll be some legal > > things to sort out at some point. I'd want someone from the > > incubator team with more experience in that area to volunteer to > > help out.

RE: Castle proposal

2004-10-03 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Leo Simons wrote: > being a C#|CLR|.Net project, I anticipate there'll be some legal > things to sort out at some point. I'd want someone from the > incubator team with more experience in that area to volunteer to > help out. We already have Bill Rowe's project and log4net. Dealing with the IP

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-03 Thread hammett
- Original Message - From: "Leo Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ah, cool. Is it open source? URL? Not really. Still under heavy development and for now it's not meant to be open source, but to host open source project issues. > Even still, we've sort-of got a general policy around the ASF

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-03 Thread Leo Simons
hammett wrote: Finally, I saw something mentioned about "XProject" in the proposal. Does that refer to http://sourceforge.net/projects/xproject?? Correct me if I'm wrong, but that seems rather dead and empty. Why not just use jira? No, its not. XProject is a project from the company we (me and a fe

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-03 Thread hammett
Howdy, mate! > Past experience with incubation is > that it takes about 6 months to a year, and that's in the case where all > developers work hard on community building. With my currently unemployment status I have more than spare time to dedicate to ASF :-) > Finally, I saw something mentioned

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-03 Thread Leo Simons
Hi all! hammett wrote: > I've submitted the first draft for your appreciation. > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CastleProposal > > Looking forward to hearing from you! :-) I conditionally volunteer to mentor this project. I know Hammett as a good developer and community player. While I don't know

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 09:56 PM 10/1/2004, hammett wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> FYI, the understanding of mono and the mod_aspdotnet projects >> is that it's not a violation to connect to a Microsoft ASP.NET >> implementation, but that some of the ASP.NET

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-01 Thread hammett
- Original Message - From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > FYI, the understanding of mono and the mod_aspdotnet projects > is that it's not a violation to connect to a Microsoft ASP.NET > implementation, but that some of the ASP.NET implementation > itself is trademarked, an

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 07:02 PM 10/1/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >FYI, the understanding of mono and the mod_aspdotnet projects >is that it's not a violation to connect to a Microsoft ASP.NET >implementation, but that some of the ASP.NET implementation >itself is trademarked, and best avoided. s/trademarked/pa

Re: Castle proposal

2004-10-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:50 PM 10/1/2004, hammett wrote: >Hello, > >I've submitted the first draft for your appreciation. >http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CastleProposal FYI, the understanding of mono and the mod_aspdotnet projects is that it's not a violation to connect to a Microsoft ASP.NET implementation, but t