----- Original Message ----- From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> FYI, the understanding of mono and the mod_aspdotnet projects > is that it's not a violation to connect to a Microsoft ASP.NET > implementation, but that some of the ASP.NET implementation > itself is trademarked, and best avoided. Yes, AFAIK the mono people are at they own risk by providing an ASP.Net implementation and even working on a Winforms implementation (not sure about the status of both). But something that I'd like to know if it's allright to host code that uses Winforms API or Asp.Net API here @ apache... Probably it is. > Thus, the mod_aspdotnet project will restrict itself to the > interface into MS .NET, and mod_mono has chosen to release > two bundles, one international, one MS patent free. Hmmm... getting the picture. > The ASF is a US corp, so we are subject to any patent > considerations. To the extent that Castle introduces new > or open frameworks, terrific! But ASP.NET should be struck > from your list of portable implementations, IMHO. So this send me back to the question about using the Asp.Net API.. :-\ Thanks so far for your clarifications, it's been very helpful. Cheers, hammett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
