On 10/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > - the PPMC has no legal standing, so no need for board notification
> i'm not sure about this. roy seems very convinced that PPMCs are
> official committees.
IMO, he's wrong. The Incubator PMC is the s
On 10/12/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> On a sort of related note, are the membership lists of the various
> PPMCs actually documented anywhere? I mean is there a PPMC version of
> committee-info.txt like there is for PMCs?
Hopefully projects are m
Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> On a sort of related note, are the membership lists of the various
> PPMCs actually documented anywhere? I mean is there a PPMC version of
> committee-info.txt like there is for PMCs?
Hopefully projects are maintaining their root status files with this info
http://incu
Garrett Rooney asked:
> are the membership lists of the various PPMCs actually documented
anywhere?
They SHOULD be in the status file, but generally are not. Coincidentally, I
had this very discussion with David Reid earlier in the week, and am looking
forward to seeing his proposal for managing
On 10/10/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given recent PPMC discussions on general@, it has been on my mind to add a
section titled "Voting in a new PPMC member" to
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
Brian McCallister and I chatted about this at the hackathon. Since havi
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > - the PPMC has no legal standing, so no need for board notification
> i'm not sure about this. roy seems very convinced that PPMCs are
> official committees.
IMO, he's wrong. The Incubator PMC is the sole body recognized by the ASF's
legal structure. The onl
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> The suggested PPMC habit would be:
> - vote in a new candidate
Notify the Incubator PMC of the ongoing vote.
> - ask for Incubator PMC acknowledgement ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Actually, IMO all that we really want is a notice, since the prior notice
(above) would have allo
Craig L Russell wrote:
> It seems to me that there is no reason for the PPMC to be official,
> since they have no power to actually release anything (which puts Apache
> at legal risk). It's the Incubator PMC that authorizes releases.
>
> "All the PPMC does" is to exercise podling oversight, which
It seems to me that there is no reason for the PPMC to be official,
since they have no power to actually release anything (which puts
Apache at legal risk). It's the Incubator PMC that authorizes releases.
"All the PPMC does" is to exercise podling oversight, which should
not legally encumb
On 10/10/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/10/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Jean,
>>
>> Your suggestion looks sound to me.
>
> +1
>
>> > Some clarifications are needed on the PPMC page, including:
>> > - the PPMC has no legal standing, so no need for
> On 10/10/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Jean,
>>
>> Your suggestion looks sound to me.
>
> +1
>
>> > Some clarifications are needed on the PPMC page, including:
>> > - the PPMC has no legal standing, so no need for board notification
>
> i'm not sure about this. roy seems v
On Oct 10, 2006, at 4:20 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
in practice i think that the PPMC will become the PMC.
Sans the mentors who signed up to help with incubation, but no intent
to participate in project development.
Andrus
--
On 10/10/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jean,
Your suggestion looks sound to me.
+1
> Some clarifications are needed on the PPMC page, including:
> - the PPMC has no legal standing, so no need for board notification
i'm not sure about this. roy seems very convinced that
Hi Jean,
Your suggestion looks sound to me.
Craig
On Oct 10, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Given recent PPMC discussions on general@, it has been on my mind
to add a
section titled "Voting in a new PPMC member" to
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
Brian McCallister
14 matches
Mail list logo
