Agree with Bill. Attic isn't the place, and Incubator has plenty or
suspended/terminated/dead/inactive/whatever-the-politically-correct-term-is
and I see no point changing this.
-- Niclas
On Jul 28, 2009 4:41 AM, "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote: > Would this be moved to the at
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Would this be moved to the attic?
Probably not. The Attic is the collection of all released Apache
Projects. Podlings != Projects, and were never accepted as projects.
Do we want to charge the Attic with such additional burdens of then
completing all IP clearances that we
Would this be moved to the attic?
On Jul 27, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
What is the procedure for updating the Web site etc.? We need to let
outsiders know that they should not depend on this incubator
project. (There
are tons of really solid incubator projects that others d
What is the procedure for updating the Web site etc.? We need to let
outsiders know that they should not depend on this incubator project. (There
are tons of really solid incubator projects that others depend on so the
theory that "incubating" means don't depend on it is just that, a theory.)
Sanj
> In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
> months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
XAP,
> I am raising this as a vote.
In favor:
Noel J. Bergman
