Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-07 Thread Craig L Russell
al Message- From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 7 August 2006 4:41 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator) given the amount of upset caused by names, i think that we should appoint

RE: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-07 Thread Gav....
> -Original Message- > From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 7 August 2006 4:41 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator) > > given the amount of upset cau

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-06 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On 8/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. hmm...sounds like we should have some docs that

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-06 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 8/5/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. +1 I can imagine how frustrating this must be

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-04 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. I can imagine how frustrating this must be to folks who are new to Apache, but folks here don't like private

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Martin- yes we solved it recently. But... the process of solving that is not quite clear. I created an issue / task in JIRA for that. I am only refering to the trademark issue; the rest was pretty easy, the community voted on the name. We only ensured that no names with *potential* trademark tro

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-04 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Also if I recall correctly, naming issues can also be solved while in the incbuator... (like adffaces has) Mvgr, Martin Danny Angus wrote: Archit, I'm very happy to here you say so, I certainly don't want to affect your progress through the incubator, in many ways I've unfairly sigled you out

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-04 Thread Danny Angus
Archit, I'm very happy to here you say so, I certainly don't want to affect your progress through the incubator, in many ways I've unfairly sigled you out as an example of a prectice I feel strongly about. Unfortunately I will be away, offline, for the next four days, but if it is still relevant

Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-04 Thread Archit Shah
The project formerly known as Blaze changed its name to Glasgow based on previous feedback and decided to follow Apache precedent (e.g. Tuscany). Apparently there are strong objections to this precendent. In our discussions, the group did come up with some ingenious names for the project, but m