hammett wrote:
> if we should have a strong community to enter incubator,
> then we will have to wait a few months :-(
As much as I'd like to see us able to facilitate community growth within the
Incubator, given the limited human resources available, particularly it
seems these days, there are g
y, in Castle proposal, section 1.1.1.2 - Community, it's stated 'The
Aspect# project have three developers involved, and the Castle container has
only one. This incubation process has the objective of attract more
contributors, new ideas, new perceptions and even new use cases that
weigh-in about how much this even matters.
Otherwise, I think your proposal looks good (and interesting).
Cliff
-Original Message-
From: hammett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Castle proposal
Hello,
I've submit
Hello all,
Well, twelve days have passed since the first draft. I think all feedback
that we could possibly receive have been stated. I'm very excited with the
incoming challenge!
Hope you guys issue a vote for Castle Proposal and I'm here to clear any
question, fear or doubt yo
hammett wrote:
Is there any more things I need to do to start the process?
We could wait a few more days for some more feedback and proposal
changes (maybe people like William and Brian want to add their name to
the committer list?), or you guys could finalize the proposal and we
start an Incuba
hammett wrote:
> Is there any more things I need to do to start the process? Anything
> related to licenses, code IP, CLAs or something like that? I'm kind
> of lost here :-)
Don't sweat it. Those are some of the things that your Mentor can help
with. You have a CLA. You will want to make sure
Hiya,
- Original Message -
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > being a C#|CLR|.Net project, I anticipate there'll be some legal
> > things to sort out at some point. I'd want someone from the
> > incubator team with more experience in that area to volunteer to
> > help out.
Leo Simons wrote:
> being a C#|CLR|.Net project, I anticipate there'll be some legal
> things to sort out at some point. I'd want someone from the
> incubator team with more experience in that area to volunteer to
> help out.
We already have Bill Rowe's project and log4net. Dealing with the IP
- Original Message -
From: "Leo Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ah, cool. Is it open source? URL?
Not really. Still under heavy development and for now it's not meant to be
open source, but to host open source project issues.
> Even still, we've sort-of got a general policy around the ASF
hammett wrote:
Finally, I saw something mentioned about "XProject" in the proposal.
Does that refer to http://sourceforge.net/projects/xproject?? Correct me
if I'm wrong, but that seems rather dead and empty. Why not just use jira?
No, its not. XProject is a project from the company we (me and a fe
Howdy, mate!
> Past experience with incubation is
> that it takes about 6 months to a year, and that's in the case where all
> developers work hard on community building.
With my currently unemployment status I have more than spare time to
dedicate to ASF :-)
> Finally, I saw something mentioned
Hi all!
hammett wrote:
> I've submitted the first draft for your appreciation.
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CastleProposal
>
> Looking forward to hearing from you! :-)
I conditionally volunteer to mentor this project. I know Hammett as a
good developer and community player. While I don't know
At 09:56 PM 10/1/2004, hammett wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> FYI, the understanding of mono and the mod_aspdotnet projects
>> is that it's not a violation to connect to a Microsoft ASP.NET
>> implementation, but that some of the ASP.NET
- Original Message -
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> FYI, the understanding of mono and the mod_aspdotnet projects
> is that it's not a violation to connect to a Microsoft ASP.NET
> implementation, but that some of the ASP.NET implementation
> itself is trademarked, an
At 07:02 PM 10/1/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>FYI, the understanding of mono and the mod_aspdotnet projects
>is that it's not a violation to connect to a Microsoft ASP.NET
>implementation, but that some of the ASP.NET implementation
>itself is trademarked, and best avoided.
s/trademarked/pa
At 01:50 PM 10/1/2004, hammett wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've submitted the first draft for your appreciation.
>http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CastleProposal
FYI, the understanding of mono and the mod_aspdotnet projects
is that it's not a violation to connect to a Microsoft ASP.NET
implementation, but t
Hello,
I've submitted the first draft for your appreciation.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CastleProposal
Looking forward to hearing from you! :-)
--
hammett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
17 matches
Mail list logo
