Justin,
Yes, I discussed this with Greg after the last Board meeting, but we've had
enough to deal with lately, and we'll likely start this in March, which was
alright with Greg (after all, we just did them all in January), so there's
still time.
We'll have to divide up the current projects, and
On 2/4/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, I think this lightens the load and increases oversite by the
> incubator PMC itself.
Yup. And, by the Directors too. =)
> It would be nice to stagger these, such that they are due 2 weeks before
> the board meeting to [EMAI
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I don't think anyone has told the Incubator this (perhaps we have and
I just missed it), but, at the last Board meeting, the Board discussed
that the Incubator should divide its projects for reporting purposes
and submit a sub-collection of podling reports each month rath
I don't think anyone has told the Incubator this (perhaps we have and
I just missed it), but, at the last Board meeting, the Board discussed
that the Incubator should divide its projects for reporting purposes
and submit a sub-collection of podling reports each month rather than
all podlings every