On 2/4/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you, I think this lightens the load and increases oversite by the > incubator PMC itself.
Yup. And, by the Directors too. =) > It would be nice to stagger these, such that they are due 2 weeks before > the board meeting to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so that the incubator committee can > remedy any issues before they are escalated to board, at least whenever > that's possible, and a revised or updated report can be provided to the > board by the incubator PMC on the usual timetable. Sure. We could have the reports due at the first of the month. That'll give ample time for the Incubator PMC to review/comment/update before it needs to go to the Board for their review. I don't think many Incubator PMC members have been carefully reviewing these reports - and they should. The Board certainly goes through all of these reports - it took us by far the largest amount of time to work through this last quarter's Incubator report. You know, I don't think it'd be the worst thing in the world for the Incubator PMC to mirror the board in another aspect: have a monthly meeting (phone or IRC?) where it could review these reports as a group. This PMC is getting *really* large and we need to better organize ourselves. -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
