Hi,
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 00:25:51 +1100
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Just to clarify the need for build instructions. The documentation
is part of the repository:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/tree/master/doc and can be
generated with "make html". Is it sufficient if we point this
Hi,
> Just to clarify the need for build instructions. The documentation is part of
> the repository: https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/tree/master/doc and
> can be generated with "make html". Is it sufficient if we point this out in
> the README? We don't want to duplicate documentatio
Hi Justin,
Just to clarify the need for build instructions. The documentation is part
of the repository: https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/tree/master/doc
and can be generated with "make html". Is it sufficient if we point this out
in the README? We don't want to duplicate documentati
Hi Justin,
I believe technically it is a), so I will leave it as is for now.
Thanks,
Jonas
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:38:05 +1100
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Correct, the copyright headers were removed. Previously the
copyright was part of the NOTICE file however we removed it after you
pointed
Hi,
> Correct, the copyright headers were removed. Previously the copyright was
> part of the NOTICE file however we removed it after you pointed out that it
> does not belong there: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRAIL-33
Right I had forgotten about that. IMO If depends on if the situat
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:15:41 +1100
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
It is signed with an Apache email address:
$ gpg --verify apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in
`apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Fri 26 Oct 2018 12:50:58 PM CEST u
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Justin Mclean wrote:
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:15:41 +0100
From: Justin Mclean
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]
It is signed with an Apache email address:
$ gpg --verify apache-crail-1.1-incubating
Hi,
> It is signed with an Apache email address:
>
> $ gpg --verify apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> gpg: assuming signed data in `apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz'
> gpg: Signature made Fri 26 Oct 2018 12:50:58 PM CEST using RSA key ID AA557B11
> gpg: Good signature from "Jonas
Hi all,
Thanks again for voting on Apache Crail 1.1-incubating rc3. I'm canceling
the vote due to found issues.
We will prepare a new release candidate to address the issues.
Thanks,
Jonas
On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:32:05 +0100
"Jonas Pfefferle" wrote:
Hi Luciano,
Thanks for your vote. We
Hi Luciano,
Thanks for your vote. We will prepare another release to address the
problems with the binary release.
Jonas
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 15:42:38 -0800
Luciano Resende wrote:
If the podling decide to release only the source artifacts I would
be +1
(binding) for that as Justin and Jul
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your vote. Some comments inline.
Jonas
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:04:22 +1100
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
I’m +1 (binding) on releasing the source package, but -1 on the
binary. Assuming you get enough votes you could IMO just release the
source artefact.
I checked:
- in
If the podling decide to release only the source artifacts I would be +1
(binding) for that as Justin and Julian mentioned.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 14:07 Julian Hyde wrote:
> Forwarding my vote from the PPMC vote: +1 (binding)
>
> I checked the source artifacts but not the binary artifacts. There
Forwarding my vote from the PPMC vote: +1 (binding)
I checked the source artifacts but not the binary artifacts. Therefore
I agree with Justin that the source artifacts can be included in the
release but not the binary artifacts.
Julian
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:04 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi
Hi,
I’m +1 (binding) on releasing the source package, but -1 on the binary.
Assuming you get enough votes you could IMO just release the source artefact.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE and NOTICE fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- no unexpected binary files
- can
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:18 AM Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
>
> Please vote to approve the release of Apache Crail 1.1-incubating (rc3).
>
>
> The podling dev vote thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00453.html
>
> The result:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache
Please vote to approve the release of Apache Crail 1.1-incubating (rc3).
The podling dev vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00453.html
The result:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00462.html
Commit to be voted upon:
https://git-wip-us.apache
16 matches
Mail list logo
