Hi,
> BTW: Justin, add a progress disclaimer and make a release,
> Does it still need go through two stage of vote process?
Yes it does. Note you also need to compile with the bundled software licensing
conditions, that would include providing a copy of the GPL license in this case.
>
After a quick discussion with james,
This vote is canceled.
We will work to fix these issues one by one.
BTW: Justin, add a progress disclaimer and make a release,
Does it still need go through two stage of vote process?
If So, is it an apache release but with some known issue?
T
Thanks, Justin,
We will check it carefully.
On 2020/01/03 01:04:56, Justin Mclean
mailto:j...@classsoftware.com>> wrote:
> Hi,>
>
> Some of us are not guys :-)>
>
> I’m -1 (binding) for three reasons:>
> - the artefact names must include "incubating “ but this can be easily fixed
> and the voti
Hi,
Some of us are not guys :-)
I’m -1 (binding) for three reasons:
- the artefact names must include "incubating “ but this can be easily fixed
and the voting doesn’t need to restarted (if this was the only issue)
- but it also contains category B code [2] under the CDDL license.
- and it also
Carry my +1 binding from dev
Best Regards,
Von Gosling
> On Dec 25, 2019, at 10:22 PM, tan zhongyi wrote:
>
> Hi， guys，
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of Apache brpc
> (incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
> (it goes to vote in incubator mail list at last.)
>
> Apache brpc commun
+1 (binding)
I checked
Download links are valid, git tag is OK.
Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
DISCLAIMER is included.
LICENSE and NOTICE files are good.
No binary file in the source kit.
I can build the kit from source kit.
It take me some time to find out how to build the source here[1
Hi， guys，
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of Apache brpc
(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
(it goes to vote in incubator mail list at last.)
Apache brpc community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0d1c8ea0d057033c05a6198920fa03e8a0
